Improving Method for Analyzing Strength of Composite Material Bolted Joint
Pengfei Chen,Meiying Zhao,Penggang Mu,Xiaopeng Wan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2758.2008.02.019
2008-01-01
Xibei Gongye Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University
Abstract:Kweon Jin-Hwe calculated fairly accurately the strength of composite material joint [4] but in the case of bolted joint, Ref. 4 did not consider the effect of tightening torque on strength. We improve the method of Ref. 4 by taking such effect into consideration. In the full paper, we explain our improvements in some detail; in this abstract, we just add some pertinent remarks to listing the two topics of explanation. The first topic is: Numerical characteristic curve method. Its four subtopics are: The determination of compressional characteristic length (subtopic 1.1), the determination of tensile characteristic length (subtopic 1.2), the characteristic curve method that considers the tightening torque of a bolt (subtopic 1.3) and failure criterion (subtopic 1.4). In subtopic 1.3, we obtain the improved characteristic curve method as shown in eq. (3) in the full paper by taking into consideration the combined effect of the size of the washer of a bolt, its tightening torque and lateral pressure. The second topic is: numerical example. In this topic, we use the improved characteristic curve method to analyze the strengths of three specimens with different geometrical dimensions of a certain type of composite material bolted joint. The calculation results, shown in Figs. 4 and 5 and Table 2 in the full paper, indicate preliminarily that the failure loads of bolted joint specimens calculated with our improved characteristic curve method are in good agreement with the experimental values in Ref. 6, the maximum error being 4.36%. The calculation results also show that the characteristic curves can be calculated totally with our numerical method without resorting to experiments.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?