Ownership structure and operational efficiency of urban public transport :Empirical research based on panel data and SFA mode
Chun-qin ZHANG,Zhi-cai JUAN,Peng JING
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13587/j.cnki.jieem.2018.02.006
2018-01-01
Abstract:Since the market-oriented reform was introduced,some Chinese municipal governments have reversed the privatization of market-oriented reform in the public transportation field.These reforms usually involve ownership structure.These reforms aim at improving the efficiency and the service level of public transportation in the context of severe public budget constrained by regulations of public transportation services.The privatization reform policy is implemented on the premise of a theoretical hypothesis,that is,ownership structure affects the performance of public transportation operators.Therefore,our main objective in this paper is to test the hypothesis by investigating to what extent the ownership structure influences the performance of public transportation operators.More precisely,the aim of this study is to assess the impact of the ownership structure on the performance of Chinese public transportation operators.To our best knowledge,no other empirical studies of the Chinese public transportation sector have already addressed this issue.The panel data set of the operation cost covering 32 different Chinese public transportation operators over the period 2008-2013 has been studied in order to test the hypotheses.The data that we use is one of our contributions.A stochastic frontier approach (SFA) based on a time-varying form of the warts-log production function has been used to obtain operational efficiency of public transit operators and influencing factors.This is an area of innovation in research methodology.In addition,when SFA is used to assess the impact of ownership structure on operational efficiency,we need to choose other exogenous variables influencing the factor of operational efficiency.Firm characteristics and city characteristics are selected as exogenous variables of the study.The empirical analysis is used to discuss the effect of ownership structure on operational-technical efficiency.According to our estimates,the mixed operators outperform public ones and private ones,and exhibit the highest level of operational efficiency.The public operators exhibit the lowest level of operational efficiency.This suggests that if we only improve operational efficiency,the resurgence of the current "nationalization" is debatable.The coefficients of scale and competition are negative and significant.However,they have the inverted U-shaped relationship with operational efficiency.These results show that scale and competition have positive effect on operational efficiency.However,this kind of positive effect has a critical point.The GDP per capita has a negative impact on operational efficiency.The coefficient of Pop is negative but insignificant,indicating that PoP has positive effect on operational efficiency.Subsidy is negatively correlated with operational efficiency and is at the significance level of 0.05.This suggests that government subsidy has a stronger substitution effect than income effect on operational efficiency.Thus,it is not true that the more subsidies the better.The first thing the government needs to do is to motivate operators to minimize operating cost and improve efficiency rather than compensate them fully.These research findings have the following implications with regards to policy-making.For a service-oriented government,the mode of mixed operators may be the best organisational choice for public transportation services as it can expand the scale of operators,promote fair competition,and mitigate the pressure on government subsidy.Thus,the equilibrium can be achieved among government regulation,market-based operation,and the involvement of social communities.Optimal efficiency and social benefit can also be realized.