RapidLoc and FastFix arthroscopic repair systems for posterior horn injury of the medial meniscus

Wei Lu,Da-ping Wang,Yun Han,Kan Ouyang,Ke Zhou,Wei-min Zhu,Hai-feng Liu,Wen-ze Feng,Hao Li,De-ming Xiao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2008.48.017
2008-01-01
Abstract:Background: Arthroscopic repair of posterior hom injury of the medial meniscus is performed by RapidLoc system and FasTFix system. Objective: To evaluate clinical effect of arthroscopic repair of posterior hom injury of the medial meniscus by RapidLoc system and FasTFix system. Design, Time and Setting: Comparative observation was performed at Department of Sports Medicine, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University between January 2007 and April 2008. Participants: Forty patients with posterior horn injury of the medial meniscus, aged 19-36 years, 29 males and 21 females, were randomly divided into two groups (n=20). Methods: All patients were respectively treated with RapidLoc system and FasTFix system. The rehabilitation plans were scheduled postoperatively and personally. Main Outcome Measures: Criteria for clinical healing included absence of locking, swelling, or joint line tenderness, and a negative McMurray test; The clinical healing rates between two groups was compared. The complications were evaluated. Results: All patients were followed up for 6 to 14 months. According to the criteria for clinical healing, three cases failed including 2 undergoing RapidLoc system and 1 undergoing FasTFix system. The healing rate by RapidLoc system was 90% and by FasTFix system 95% respectively (P < 0.05). Vessel, nerve and tendon injuries took place in two groups, and one developed infection following FasTFix system treatment. Conclusion: Although fixation type and initial tension are different, appropriate application and postoperative rehabilitation procedure will achieve a good healing rate by both systems.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?