Comparison between CPF and PDIP for voltage stability margin evaluation

文学鸿,袁越,鞠平
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6047.2008.05.014
2008-01-01
Abstract:CPF (Continuation Power Flow method) and PDIP (Primal-Dual Interior Point method) are normally used in the margin evaluation of voltage stability. They are compared with an IEEE 118-bus system and a real power grid as examples. The computational accuracies of both methods are nearly same and satisfying when their boundary conditions are comparative. As for the reliability, PDIP is an iterative algorithm and there will be no results if the convergence conditions are not satisfied, while CPF is based on power flow computation and the satisfying results are normally reached. In CPF, the load increase modes can be flexibly selected, the power generation sequence adjusted, and the switching operation of transmission line considered, which makes the computational results more realistic. Moreover, there is rich useful intermediate information of CPF, The conclusion is that CPF is superior to PDIP.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?