Study on Effects of Error Models on Precise Point Positioning Accuracy
Shengbao Cai,LI Meng-heng,Zhong Sheng-de,Tuanfa Qin,Guangxi Colleges
2020-01-01
Abstract:The precise point positioning requires high quality of observation data, and all kinds of errors must be accurately corrected. In order to clarify the influence of error models on positioning accuracy and realize PPP more accurately, on the basis of the non-ionosphere observation model, six MGEX stations are selected, the precision ephemeris provided by the global analysis center and the troposphere model of the RTKLIB are adopted to realize the post-processing PPP resolution. Then the convergence curve and positioning error are evaluated. Simulation results show that there are more than 6 satellites, and DOP value is less than 3, so the data quality of MGEX station is better. The average positioning accuracy of east, north and sky are counted. Compared with two precise ephemerises IGS(International GNSS Service) and JPL(Jet Propulsion Laboratory), the difference of positioning accuracy between the two precise ephemeris are 0.18 %,0.53 % and 2.31 % respectively in static PPP, and 6.23 %, 10.50 % and 9.91 % respectively in dynamic PPP. In static PPP, the average positioning accuracy of the Saastamoinen model is 2.213 cm, 0.209 cm and 0.533 cm, while the average positioning accuracy of the Estimate ZTD model is 0.553 cm, 0.101 cm and 0.27 cm, which is 300.6 %, 114.88 %, 97.22 % higher than that of Saastamoinen, respectively. In dynaminc PPP, the average positioning accuracy of the Saastamoinen model is 6.368 cm, 23.683 cm, and 68.043 cm respectively, while the average positioning accuracy of the Estimate ZTD model is 9.243 cm, 5.741 cm, and 14.553 cm, which is 300.6 %, 114.88 % and 97.22 % higher than that of Saastamoinen, respectively.