Abstract:Models of spatial relations are a key component of geographical information science (GIS). Efforts have been made to formally define spatial relations. The foundation model for such a formal presentation is the 4-intersection model proposed by Egenhofer and Franzosa (1991). In this model, the topological relations between two simple spatial entities A and B are transformed into point-set topology problems in terms of the intersections of A's interior and boundary with B's interior and boundary. Later, Egenhofer and Herring (1991) extended this model to 9-intersection by addition of another element, i.e. the exterior of an entity, which is then defined as its complement. However, the use of its complement as the exterior of an entity causes the linear dependency between its interior, boundary and exterior. Thus such an extension from 4- to 9-intersection should be of no help in terms of the number of relations. This can be confirmed by the discovery of Egenhofer et al. (1993). The distinction of additional relations in the case where the co-dimension is not zero is purely due to the adoption of definitions of the interior, boundary and exterior of entities in a lower dimensional to a higher dimension of space, e.g. lines in 1-dimensional space to 2-dimensional space. With such adoption, the topological convention that the boundary of a spatial entity separates its interior from its exterior is violated. It is such a change of conventional topological properties that causes the linear dependency between these three elements of a spatial entity (i.e. the interior, boundary and exterior) to disappear, thus making the distinction of additional relations possible in such a case (i.e. the co-dimension is not zero).It has been discussed that the use of Voronoi-regions of an entity to replace its complement as its exterior in the 9-intersection model would solve the problem (i.e. violation of topological convention) or would make this model become more comprehensive. Therefore, a Voronoi-based 9-intersection model is proposed. In addition to the improvement in the theoretical aspect, the Voronoi-based 9-intersection model (V9I) can also distinguish additional relations which are beyond topological relations, such as high-resolution disjoint relations and relations of complex spatial entities. However, high-resolution disjoint relations defined by this model are not purely topological. In fact, it is a mixture of topology and metric.

Design of an Extended Qualitative Cardinal Direction Relation Model Based on Ontology

An Ontology-Based Semantic Retrieval Approach for Heterogeneous 3D CAD Models

Model Semantic Relations with Extended Attributes

A Qualitative Description Model of Detailed Direction Relations

Qualitative Description and Reasoning of Spatial Distance and Direction

Ontology Based Semantic Modeling for Chinese Ancient Architectures.

Modeling Complex Architectures Based on Granular Computing on Ontology

Model of middleware framework in demand for management information ontology

Reasoning about Cardinal Directions between Extended Objects

Multi-scale Qualitative Location: A Direction-Based Model

Integrative Representation and Inference of Qualitative Locations about Points, Lines, and Polygons

An Unified CGA-Based Formal Expression of Spatio-Temporal Topological Relations for Computation and Analysis of Geographic Objects

Ontology Method for 3DGIS Modeling

Multi-Scale Qualitative Location: A Topology-Based Model.

Explore Modeling Relation Information and Direction Information in KBQA

Modeling and querying approximate direction relations

A Voronoi-Based 9-Intersection Model For Spatial Relations

Voronoi-based 9-Intersection Model for Topological Spatial Relations

A Refined Lines/Regions and Lines/Lines Topological Relations Model Based on Whole-Whole Objects Intersection Components

Deriving Topological Relations Between Uncertain Regions from Direction Relations

Qualitative Reasoning of Topological Relations Between Uncertain Regions