Synthesis, Characterisation of Two Hexa-Iron Clusters with {fe2s2(co)x} (x = 5 or 6) Fragments and Investigation into Their Inter-Conversion

Wei Zhong,Giuseppe Zampella,Zhimei Li,Luca De Gioia,Yinqiu Liu,Xirui Zeng,Qiuyan Luo,Xiaoming Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorganchem.2008.09.021
IF: 2.345
2008-01-01
Journal of Organometallic Chemistry
Abstract:Reaction of a trithiol ligand, 2-(mercaptomethyl)-2-methylpropane-1,3-dithiol (H(3)L), with tri-iron dodecacarbonyl in toluene produces two hexa-iron clusters ( 1 and 2). The two clusters are characterised crystallographically and spectroscopically. NMR spectroscopy reveals that the cluster 2 exists in two conformations in equilibrium 2(anti) double left right arrow 2(syn) and the equilibrium constant K(eq) = 0.55 under CO atmosphere. In the cluster 2, the central {Fe(2)S(2)(CO)(6)} sub-unit is flanked by two identical {Fe(2)S(2)(CO)(6)} satellite sub-units through thiolate linkages whereas one of the thiolate linkages can further form Fe-S bond with the proximal Fe atom in one of the two satellite sub-units to produce the cluster 1 by expelling one CO. This conversion can be entirely reversed by continuously purging CO through the solution of the cluster 1. As suggested by DFT calculations, the conversion features a key step, the rotation of the Fe(prox)(CO)(3) to expose a vacant site for exogenic ligand binding ( the S atom from the central sub-unit in this case) with concomitant switch for one of the three CO ligands in the unit of Fe(prox)(CO)(3) from terminal to bridging orientation. The conversion from the clusters 1-2 involving one CO uptake is much faster than its reverse process since the latter is an endergonic process characterised by large reaction barriers, as revealed by the DFT calculations. (C) 2008 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?