STRUCTURE AND KINEMATICS OF THE YALASHANGBO DOME IN THE NORTHERN HIMALAYAN DOME BELT, CHINA

Jinjiang Zhang,Lei Guo,Bo Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0563-5020.2007.01.003
2007-01-01
Abstract:The Yalashangbo Dome is one of the structures in the Northern Himalayan Dome Belt. It consisted of three lithologic-structural units separated by a brittle upper detachment fault and a ductile lower detachment fault. The low-grade metamorphic Tibetan sedimentary succession and mafic sills formed the covering upper plate above the upper detachment fault. The core of the dome beneath the lower detachment fault was composed of mylonitic gneisses of Greater Himalayan Crystallines and a core granite pluton. The phyllonites and mylonitic schists made up the middle unit between the upper and lower detachment faults, which might be the intensively thinned basal part of Tibetan sedimentary succession. This dome experienced three episodes of deformation. The first episode of deformation was preserved locally in the lower part of the core gneisses, representing an earlier top-down-to-SSE movement whose mechanism needed further study. The second one was a dominant deformation in the dome, which was a unified top-down-to-NNW movement in all shear zones associated with the dome. The third episode of deformation was a slip down to the outsides of dome, indicating a collapse after the NNW-directed movement. The core gneisses of the Yalashangbo Dome were same to the petrological association of Greater Himalayan Crystallines, the lower detachment fault was a main fault in the dome, and the middle unit between the upper and lower detachment faults might be basal part of Tibetan sedimentary succession. Therefore, The lower detachment fault of the Yalashangbo Dome might be an exposure of the southern Tibetan detachment system (STDS) in northern Himalaya, which separateed the low-grade Tibetan sedimentary succession from the Greater Himalayan Crystallines in core of the dome. In an earlier period (∼ 14.5 Ma ago), the area of the Yalashangbo Dome experienced a roughly north-directed detachment along the possibly STDS; later on (after ∼ 13.5 Ma), this area was domed and the STDS was exhumed caused by the emplacement the core pluton and isostatic rebound.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?