Clinical analysis of 52 cases with Enterobacter cloacae bloodstream infection

Juan-juan DING,Xiao-ju Lü,Zhi-yong ZONG,Ya-li XIONG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1009-7708.2007.02.012
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To study the clinical and microbiological features, antimicrobial resistance patterns, possible risk factors in patients with bloodstream infection caused by E. cloacae. Methods: We reviewed the records about bloodstream infection caused by E. cloacae from 2000 to May 2005, and retrospectively analyzed the corresponding laboratory findings and medical records. Results: A total of 52 cases were included in this analysis, 25 were from Department of Urology. Forty-five cases were hospital-acquired infection. Primary infection was identified in 6 cases. One E. cloacae strain was resistant to imipenem, and 30 were resistant to third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins. Seven patients died of bloodstream infection. Conclusions: In our hospital, bloodstream infection caused by E. cloacae is not a common infection. The patients in Department of Urology are vulnerable to E. cloacae bloodstream infection. Urological surgery and urinary catheter placement are major contributing factors for E. cloacae bloodstream infection. Other risk factors include kidney transplantation, prior use of antibiotic, corticosteroids and cytotoxic therapy. E. cloacae isolates from bloodstream infection are usually multi-drug resistant, especially to broad-spectrum cephalosporins. Most patients can survive after appropriate therapy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?