Comparative study of Som suggested nodal classification and RTOG suggested guidelines in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

WANG Xiao-shen,HU Chao-su,Chao Yan,HE Xia-yun,LI Long-gen,WU Yong-ru,Yan Feng
2007-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the limitation of Som suggested classification and RTOG suggested guidelines of cervical nodes according to nodal involvement of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS:A total of 259 NPC patients received consecutive contrast-enhanced transverse CT scan and the scan range extended from the skull base to the inferior border of the clavicle. Interpretation of the images and assessment of the involved nodes distribution were performed by both radiation oncologists and diagnostic radiologists according to Som suggested classification and RTOG suggested classification guidelines of the neck, respectively. RESULTS: Of 259 patients, 218 had nodal involvements. The nodal distributions, according to Som suggested nodal classification, were 0 inⅠA, 6 inⅠB, 136 in ⅡA, 171 in ⅡB, 78 in Ⅲ, 20 in Ⅳ, 60 in V, 0 in Ⅵ and Ⅶ, 5 in supraclavicle, 102 in retropharynx, respectively. Another 55 cases had lesions medial to the border of internal carotid artery, 2 cm from inferior to the skull base to the hyoid bone. According to RTOG guidelines, the nodal distributions were 0 inⅠA, 6 inⅠB, 115 in ⅡA, 192 in ⅡB, 78 in Ⅲ, 20 in Ⅳ, 65 in V, 0 in Ⅵ, 157 in retropharynx, respectively. However, 38 cases in level ⅡB had lesions beyond the caudal edge of the first cervical vertebra (C1), and 2 cases had lesions at the preauricular area, which belonged to none of the above levels. CONCLUSIONS: The Som suggests that the nodal classification method does not fully cover the retropharyngeal nodes and it would be better to shift the inferior boundary of the retropharyngeal space to the level of the hyoid bone, and the RTOG guidelines does not fully cover ⅡB nodes and it would be better to shift the superior boundary of ⅡB to the cranial edge of C1.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?