The Crystallization Morphology Evolution Of Polyoxymethylene/Poly(Ethylene Oxide) Blend Micropart Prepared Under Microinjection Molding Conditions
changbin tan,shibing bai,qi wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/app.40538
IF: 3
2014-01-01
Journal of Applied Polymer Science
Abstract:This article is the first study on the microinjection molding and the effects of the microprocessing parameters on the crystallization and orientation of polyoxymethylene/poly(ethylene oxide) (POM/PEO) blend, which has better toughness and self-lubricity compared with the neat POM and therefore is a better candidate material for making microparts like microgears with higher performances. The crystalline and phase morphologies were investigated by polarized light microscope (PLM), differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) and scanning electron microscope (SEM). The crystalline orientation of the microparts was evaluated by two-dimensional wide-angle X-ray diffraction (2D-WAXD) and Herman's orientation function. The experimental results showed that both POM and POM/PEO microparts prepared by microinjection molding exhibited three distinct layers, i.e., skin layer, shear layer and core layer, while the latter had thicker shear layer but thinner skin layer and core layer. PEO was well dispersed in POM matrix. The spherulite size, the melting point as well as the crystallinity of POM in the POM/PEO blend decreased due to the interference of PEO in the crystallization of POM. A shish-kebab structure was observed in the shear layers of the POM/PEO microparts. The effects of processing parameters on the thicknesses of different layers of the POM/PEO microparts were investigated. With increase of the injection speed or decrease of the mold temperature, the skin layer and the core layer became thicker, while the shear layer and the oriented region became thinner. However, the influence of the injection pressure was not obvious. Also, the processing parameters affected the crystalline orientation of the POM/PEO microparts. With increase of the injection speed or decrease of the mold temperature, the orientation function f decreased, indicating a lower degree of orientation. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014, 131, 40538.