An Effective Transonic Inverse Design Method for Aeroelastic Wing

Juntao Xiong,Zhide Qiao,Xudong Yang,Jinhui Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2758.2007.01.003
2007-01-01
Xibei Gongye Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University
Abstract:Aim. In a previous paper[6], Northwestern Polytechnical University researchers dealt with the same problem but it contained some shortcomings which we believe can be removed by the effective method we now present. This effective method is an aerodynamic and elastic integrated design method for wing using control theory. In the full paper, we explain our effective method in detail; in this abstract) we just add some pertinent remarks to listing the two topics of explanation; (1) static aeroelastic analysis and (2) design method; the three subtopics of topic 1 are flowfield analysis (subtopic 1.1), structural analysis (subtopic 1.2), and static aeroelastically coupled solution (subtopic 1.3); under subtopic 1.1 we employ 3-D Euler equations and its employment is one reason why our method is effective; under topic 2, following the excellent idea proposed by Jameson[1,2] on aerodynamic shape optimization through cleverly employing control theory, we derive eqs. (6) through (20) in the full paper and Jameson's idea is the main reason why our method is effective. Finally we take the M100 transonic aeroelastic wing as example. Using our effective method, we obtained numerical results as shown in Figs.4 through 8 in the full paper. In Fig.8, it can be seen clearly that, regardless of the initial values we take for wing pressure distribution, the design wing pressure distribution can always approach the target wing pressure distribution very closely.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?