Comparison between the effects of ocular surface reconstruction by fresh and preserved amniotic membranes

GF Tang,YM Yan,YL Wang,XC Cui,YM Zhang,XX Fu,ZH Deng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2007.16.016
2007-01-01
Abstract:Aim: Fresh amniotic membranes (AMs) are effective on the ocular surface reconstruction of patients with serious diseases, but the operation time and material sources are in debate. This paper aims to evaluate the therapeutic effects of fresh and preserved AMs for reforming ocular surface structure. Methods: A total of 36 patients (43 eyes) who had serious ocular disease were enrolled from the Department of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College from January 2004 to December 2005, and were randomly divided two groups: transplantation of fresh AMs (23 eyes) and transplantation of preserved AMs (20 eyes). All the subjects were followed up everyday at the first week and then once a week, until the AMs were survival for one month. Then the survival of AMs transplants was observed under slit lamp to investigate the corneal and conjunctival epithelization, neovascular vessel, visual acuity and complications after the operation. Results: All 36 patients of 43 eyes were involved in the result analysis without any drop. 1 All 36 patients of 43 eyes were followed up for 2-8 months, including 8 eyes for less than 2 months, 20 eyes for 2-5 months and 15 eyes for 6-8 months. 2 In fresh AMs group, operative eyes showed an improvement in visual acuity (83%). In preserved AMs group, those eyes showed an improvement in visual acuity (90%). There was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). 4 In fresh group, 21 eyes (91.3%) showed a hyperemia regression 2 or 3 weeks after operation, 2 eyes (8.7%) regressed 4 weeks after operation. In preserved group, 19 eyes (95%) showed a hyperemia regression 2 weeks after operation, 1 eye (5%) regressed 4 weeks after operation. There was no significant difference between two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Transplantation of AMs has positive therapeutic effects for improving ocular surface and reforming epithelium in patients with serious ocular diseases. The clinical effects and outcome of treating ocular surface disorder with fresh AMs transplantation is the same as that with preserved AMs transplantation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?