Comparison of bone marrow versus explant culture methods for adult osteoblast

CJ Piao,Q Jiang,DY Chen,ZH Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2007.23.033
2007-01-01
Abstract:AIM: To compare the proliferation, differentiation, osteogenic ability, and morphology of primary osteoblast cultured by two methods, and look for a more simple and effective method for osteoblast culture. METHODS: The experiment was conducted in the Department of Scientific Research, Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Nanjing University from March to October 2006. ①The cancellated bone of tibia and femur was harvested from the arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of a patient with anterior and/or posterior cruciate ligament. The bone marrow of the same patient was collected for osteoblast culture. ②In the same culture condition, the osteoblasts harvested from cancellated bone and marrow were primarily cultured with explant culture and bone marrow culture methods. ③The morphological changes of primary osteoblast were observed under inverted phase contrast microscope, and the number and percentage of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) stained positive cells were calculated by modified Gomori method. Cell proliferation curve was drawn by MTT assay. ALP content and proliferation of osteoblast were detected by NPP method. The osteogenic ability of osteoblast was compared by Von Kossa staining. RESULTS: ①The result from inverted phase contrast microscope showed that there was no difference in cell shape by two methods. ②The purification of osteoblast cultured with explant culture from cancellated bone was higher than that from marrow [(90±6)%, (68±10)%]. ③Results of MTT assay showed the proliferation of cells cultured with explant culture from cancellated bone was superior to that from marrow since the third day; ALP activity test suggested that the differentiation of osteoblast harvested from the marrow was more active than that from the cancellated bone. ④The quantity of mineralized nodules stained by Von Kossa was no difference [explant culture: (8±6)/sight; bone marrow: (12±3)/sight]. CONCLUSION: Explant culture and marrow culture have respective advantage and defect. Therefore, it is suitable to select the corresponding method according to empirical demand.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?