Abstract:SystemC has become a de-facto standard language for SoC and ASIP designs. The verification of implementation with SystemC is the key to guarantee the correctness of designs and prevent the errors from propagating to the lower levels. The gap between SystemC TLM model and its corresponding formal model makes it hard to perform automated translation between them. SystemC describes process behavior in sequential statements and usually employs intermediate variables, while most model checking languages for hardware only describe parallel behaviors, in which the usage of intermediate variables not only increases state space and may prolong execution time, but also introduce potential errors. For a model checking language which supports parallel description, the elimination of redundant intermediate variables is requisite and also an efficient way to reduce the state space. This paper intends to solve these issues: (1) proposing an extraction method that can implement the translation from a description which supports sequential execution to a description supports parallel execution; (2) identifying and removing redundant intermediate variables. In this paper, a novel mechanism is presented to automatically extract behavior description from SystemC to a widespreadly used model checking language SMV. We have implemented a tool SC2SMV and performed actual extraction process on it to demonstrate the effectiveness of the method presented in this paper.

Combining Explicit and Symbolic Representation in Incremental Model Checking

Incremental Model Checking for Fuzzy Computation Tree Logic

Stepwise CTL model checking

Bounded Model Checking of CTL

Bounded Model Checking for Branching-Time Temporal Logic

Incremental Semantic LTL Bounded Model Checking

Counterexample-Preserving Reduction for Symbolic Model Checking

Combining Model Learning and Model Checking to Analyze Java Libraries

Symbolic Assume-Guarantee Reasoning Through BDD Learning

Enhancing Sat-Based Equivalence Checking with Improved Static Implications

Precisely Deciding CSL Formulas Through Approximate Model Checking for CTMCs.

Qbf-Based Symbolic Model Checking For Knowledge And Time

A New Temporal Logic CTL[k-QDDC] and Its Verification

Harnessing SMT-Based Bounded Model Checking Through Stateless Explicit-State Exploration

Model Checking Computation Tree Logic over Finite Lattices

Accelerating Software Model Checking Based on Program Backbone.

Model Checking over Paraconsistent Temporal Logic

Symbolic and Structural Model-Checking

An Effective Model Extraction Method with State Space Compression for Model Checking SystemC TLM Designs

Bounded Model Checking Combining Symbolic Trajectory Evaluation Abstraction With Hybrid Three-Valued Sat Solving

Optimizing the SAT Decision Ordering of Bounded Model Checking by Structural Information