Application of nano-hydroxyapatite/collagen in orthopaedics

Tie-cheng Shen,Qing Xia,Yong-hui Huang,XF Xu,FZ Cui,J Tian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2007.01.012

2007-01-01

Abstract:Aim: To observe the healing time and the repairing effects of bone after nano-hydroxyapatite/collagen (NHAC) implantation and study its clinical application in orthopaedics. Methods: From March 2003 to March 2005, there were 32 cases with bone defects enrolled from Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, and they all underwent surgical procedure but had bone defects, as well as 5 cases with nonunion, 4 cases with benign bone tumor and 4 cases with spondylolysis. All of them were diagnosed by X ray according to self-designed standard of this clinical experiment, and knew the treatment scheme and agreed. 1 In the bone defects after bone fracture, it was comminuted fracture in all parts of four limbs, after operation and reduction it presented bone defects. So NHAC was implanted. 2 In the nonunion of bone, we excised the scar and ossified tissue in fracture, and reamed the medullary cavity, and then implanted the NHAC. 3 In the benign bone tumor, NHAC was implanted after excision of diseased bone. 4 In the spondylolysis, NHAC together with autograft were implanted in 2 cases after decompression, RF reduction and internal fixation. In one case, autologous bone was implanted in his left side while NHAC was implanted in the right side. Another one case received the operation of autologous bone implantation, but the healing isthmus was not solid, so NHAC was implanted. Results: Totally 42 cases were followed up. 1 Among the 29 cases of bone defects, 25 cases got clinical healing from 2 to 7 months after operation. As for other 4 cases, one case of ulnar bone defect showed nonunion after NHAC had been implanted for 2 years, and got healing effect at 2 years and 9 months after implantation; In one case of comminuted bone fracture in upper and middle tibial bone, a few of bone scars were observed at 15 months after implantation. The other two were reoperated for restoration and internal fixation, because of broken fixator as the patients exerted a heavy burden on the suffering broken limb. 2 Among those 5 bone nonunion cases, 2 cases got healing 9 months later; 3 cases got nonunion after only NHAC implantation, including 2 cases got healing after reoperation by autologous bone implantation in 1 year. 3 Among 4 cases with benign bone tumor, we got good results in 2 cases of bone cyst. But in the other 2 cases of osteofibrous dysplasia, we reoperated with autograft of bone and got healing. 4 Among the 4 cases of spondylolisthesis, the preoperative symptoms (backleg pain) of 3 cases disappeared, and the broken shadows were not found through X-ray, while the rest one still felt benumbed and pain in lower limbs and presented no healing via X ray. Conclusion: NHAC has good biocompatibility and biodegradability. After being implanted in bodies, it has good conductibility, and can be used in bone defects induced by crushed bone fracture in limbs; but it has no osteal conductivity, for bone defect caused by nonunion and benign bone tumor etc. we should use NHAC together with autograft.