Biocompatibility of perfluoro (propoxy-polytetrafluoroethylene) versus traditional gel silica after implantation in vivo

KY Li,YM Zhang,YJ Sun,QH LI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2007.18.035
2007-01-01
Abstract:Aim: To evaluate the biocompatibility of perfluoro (propoxy-polytetrafluoroethylene) as a novel biological implanting material by animal embedding experiment. Methods: The experiment was conducted in the School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering and Department of Otolaryngology and Neck Surgery, First People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University from September 2004 and April 2006. 1 Perfluoro (propoxy-polytetrafluoroethylene) was prepared by reacting tetafluoroethylene with hexafluodnepropane in a constant temperature and pressure with certain catalyst. The Mr of the resultant polymer was 105-107, and with translucence similar to gel silica. Meanwhile, the gel silica prothesis widely used in nose augmentation was adopted as control. 2 Thirty healthy guinea pigs were selected and numbered randomly to put the polymer and silica module between the skin and superficial fascia of left and right hind legs, which served as polymer group and gel silica group. To prevent systematic error, the polymer was implanted into the left legs of animals numbered in odd and the right legs of animals numbered in dual, and the silica gel into the right ones of odd number animals and left ones of dual number animals. No. 1-10, 11-20, and 21-30 guinea pigs were executed under anesthesia on days 15, 30, and 60 after operation respectively. The materials and surrounding tissues were taken out from the animals for HE staining. The reaction and changes of cell and surrounding tissues were observed under light microscope to compare their biocompatibility. Results: None of the animals was infected after operation and no antibiotics were used. The rejection was found in No. 25 guinea pig; the gel silica implanted was rejected from the right leg 10 days after the operation, and then the incision healed itself. All the incisions of the guinea pigs healed naturally after operation. 1 Fifteen days after implantation, there were a great amount of infiltrated heterophilic granulocytes accompanied by obvious congestion around the materials, but no cyst wall formed. 2 One month later, there were a great amount of infiltrated heterophilic granulocytes but still no cyst wall formed. In the gel silica group, there was obvious capillary hemorrhage iaround tissues. 3 Sixty days later, the cyst wall of the polymer group was much thinner than that of the gel silica group [(35.01±14.03)μm vs. (66.63±17.96) μm, t=6.849, P < 0.01]. Conclusion: Biocompatibility of perfluoro (propoxy-polytetrafluoroethylene) is better than those of traditional gel silica materials.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?