S-Pb isotope geochemistry and Rb-Sr geochronology of the Penglai gold field in the eastern Shangdong province

Minglan Hou,Shaoyong Jiang,Yaohui Jiang,Hongfei Ling
IF: 1.468
2006-01-01
Acta Petrologica Sinica
Abstract:Penglai gold field is located in the Qixia-Penglai gold belt, one of the three large gold belts in the eastearn Shangdong province (Jiaodong). In this study, we report S, Pb and Rb-Sr isotope data of the Heilangou, Daliuhang, and Hexi gold deposits from the Penglai gold field, and compare them with those large and super-large gold deposits from the Linglong gold field. The sulfur isotopes in the Penglai gold field show an overall range from 6.3‰ to 9.5‰ average 7.5‰. The δ34 S values are 7.4‰ to 8.5‰ in the Hexi deposit; 6.3‰ to 9.5‰ in the Heilangou deposit; and 6.4‰ to 8.2‰ in the Daliuhang deposit. These sulfur isotope data are similar to those of the Linglong gold field (δ 34 S = 6.4‰ ∼ 8.6‰, average7.6‰). The lead isotope variations are small in the Penglai gold field. The 206 Pb/204 Pb, 207 Pb/204 Pb, and208 Pb/204 Pb ratios in the Hexi deposit are 38.0642 ∼ 38.3698, 17.3086∼17.4799, and 15.5264 ∼ 15.5543, respectively. Those ratios in the Daliuhang deposit are 17.3653 ∼ 17.5037, 15.5142 ∼ 15.5355, and 38.1249 ∼ 38.3136, respectively, whereas in the Heilangou deposits, these ratios are 17.3558 ∼ 17.5958, 15.5105 ∼ 15.5746, and 38.0749 ∼ 38.4361, respectively. These data are plotted near the orogen curve of the Zartman and Doe (1981) Plumbotectonic model. The lead isotope data in the Penglai gold field are similar to those in the Linglong gold field, and both are close to the data for mafic dikes in the area, but totally different from the host granites, suggesting that the ore lead shares similar origin with the mantle-derived mafic rocks. The linear array of the ore lead isotope suggests a mixing of mantle-derived and crust-derived sources. The Rb-Sr isotope dating of pyrites from the Penglai gold field yields an isochron age of 122.3 ± 3.1Ma (MSWD = 1.7) with initial 87Sr/86Sr ratio of 0.71208 for the Hexi deposit, and an isochron age of 117.8 ± 6.5Ma (MSWD = 17) with initial 87Sr/86Sr ratio of 0.71085 for the Heilangou and Daliuhang deposits. These data suggest a similar mineralization age for the Penglai and Linglong gold field, with ore materials derived from mixing of mantle and crust-derived sources. On the basis of similar geologic, geochemical features and ore formation ages in the Penglai and Linglong gold fields, we suggest a great potential for occurrence of large and super-large gold deposits in the Penglai gold field.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?