Multislice CT Water Enema Versus Colonoscopy and Contrast Barium Enema for Evaluation of Large Bowel Diseases

ZHAO Xi-hai,XU Jian-rong,LI Cheng,HUA Jia,LU Qing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1003-3289.2006.06.037
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective To determine the accuracy of 16-slice spiral CT in the detection of large bowel diseases with water enema preparation, comparing with colonoscopy and barium enema (BE). Methods Multislice CT (MSCT) water enema was performed in 43 consecutive patients suspected large bowel diseases, 21 patients received BE examination and 22 patients received colonoscopy examination within one week. Pre- and post-contrast CT scans were performed in all patients. The diagnosis for large bowel disease were made by two experienced gastrointestinal radiologists with consensus. Results Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy of MSCT water enema for diagnosis of large bowel diseases were 86.8%, 80%, 44.4%, 97.1% and 86.1% respectively; of colonoscopy were 80%, 50%, 20%, 94.1% and 77.3% respectively; of BE were 72.2%, 33.3%, 16.7%, 86.7% and 66.7% respectively. The accuracy for accurate localization in detecting large bowel diseases by MSCT water enema, colonoscopy and BE were 86.1%, 59.1%, 76.2% respectively. There was no significant difference between MSCT water enema and the other two examination methods (MSCT vs BE, P=0.099; MSCT vs colonoscopy, P=0.487), for the accuracy of diagnosing large bowel disease. MSCT water enema was significantly higher than colonoscopy (P=0.027) and similar to that of BE (P=0.481) for the accurate localization in detecting large bowel diseases. Conclusion MSCT water enema detects large bowel diseases with high sensitivity and specificity. The accuracy for the accurate localization in detecting large bowel diseases by MSCT water enema is higher than colonoscopy and similar to BE.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?