Dose-dependent protective effects of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor in corpus striatum on dopaminergic neurons of model rats with Parkinson disease

Si-yuan Zhang,Jian-guo Qi,Wei Zhang,Yi He,Feng Bi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2006.02.039
2006-01-01
Abstract:Aim: To investigate the neuroprotective effects of different dose of the glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) on the black substance dopaminergic neurons in rat models with hemiparkinson disease induced by the 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA). Methods: The experiment was conducted at the Staff Room of Histology, Embryology and Neurobiology and Research Room of Signal Transduction and Molecular Targeting Therapy, West China Medical Center, Sichuan University from April to October 2005. Twenty SD male rats aged 1.5 months were selected. 6-OHDA was injected into medial forebrain bundle (MFB) of rats. After 4-week treatment, changes of the quantity of positive neurons of black substance tyroxine hydroxylase of midbrain, microglia and astrocytes were detected with immunohistochemical method. The Parkinson disease rat models were made. Fifteen SD rats were assigned into 3 groups: control group, 10 μg GDNF treatment group and 100 μg GDNF treatment group with 5 rats in each group. 5 g/L 6-OHDA 4 mL were injected into medial forebrain bundle of the right side to make Parkinson disease models. Different dose of GDNF (5 g /L or 25 g /L, dissolved with saline) was injected into corpus striatum at the same side. The same dose of saline was injected into corpus stiatum of the rats of control group. Four weeks after operation, experimental animals were gained, anesthetizing, filling, filleting, and then performing immunohistochemical reaction of tyroxine hydroxylase of midbrain. Quantity of cells was counted under microscope. The statistics methods of paired t-test, ANOVA and SNK were used. Results: All the animals existed well, no death, and were involved in the result analysis. 1 There were insignificant changes in the formation of positive neurons of tyroxine hydroxylase at the injured side, but the quantity decreased obviously, and lower markedly than that at the contralateral side, and had significant difference [(11.36±3.85) , (115.12±17.06), t= 3.078,P < 0.01]. 2 The bodies of most of the microglias at the injured side became round and enlarged; Apophysis became short and thick; Staining became dark. It was higher at the injured side than that at the contralateral side, and had remarkably difference [(292.20±19.73), (80.40±10.00) t=2.832,P < 0.01]. 3 The quantity of astrocytes at the injured side of black substance of the midbrain increased distinctly. The bodies of proliferative GFAP positive astrocytes were hypertrophy; Apophysis became short and thick; Staining became dark. It was higher at the injured side than that at the contralateral side, and h ad remarkably difference [(507.642±19.99), (226.88±20.30),t= 2.971,P < 0.01]. 4 The quantity of positive neurons of black substance tyroxine hydroxylase at the injured side was lower clearly than that at the contralateral side, and had remarkably difference [(10.16±2.90), (116.84±15.92),t= 3.975,P < 0.01]. It was higher at the injured side than that in the contralateral side of the 10 μg GDNF treatment group, and had significant difference [(114.60±18.71), (66.24±17.19) t= 3.811,P < 0.01]. It was higher at the injured side than that in the contralateral side of the 100 μg GDNF treatment group, and had significant difference [(114.88±19.211), (92.72±16.29) t= 3.725, P < 0.01]. 5 The quantity of surviving positive neurons of tyroxine hydroxylae in the GDNF treatment group was higher distinctly than that in the control group (P < 0.01). The surviving rate of neurons in the 100 μg GDNF treatment group was higher markedly than that in the 10 μg GDNF treatment group, and had obvious difference (P < 0.01). Conclusion: The GDNF in the corpus striatum has significantly protective effects on dopaminergic neuron, and has dose-dependent effect between 10 μg and 100 μg.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?