Effects and mechanisms of S-adenosylmethionine against ethanol-induced liver injury in rats

Pin Zhang,Zuo-jiong Gong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2006.08.051
2006-01-01
Abstract:AIM: To investigate the preventive effects of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), donor active methyl in vivo, on ethanol-induced liver injury in rats. METHODS: The experiment was performed in the Laboratory of Department of Infection, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University in 2005. Forty-eight SD rats were randomly divided into 4 groups (n=12): normal group, model group, SAM 100 and 200 mg/kg groups. ①Except normal group, all rats were fed with 0.5 mL fish oil plus ethanol gavage for 8 weeks in order to induce ethanol-induced liver injury. ②After building models for 4 weeks, the drug treatment was began, and 100 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg SAM per day intraperitoneally were given to rats in the SAM 100 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg groups, respectively, at the 30 minutes after gastric perfusion every day, till the end of establishing models. ③At the 8th week the rats were killed. Serum levels of aminotransferase, aspartic acid transferase, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), interleukin (IL-10) were detected. Meanwhile, liver activity of superoxidezed dismutase (SOD), contents of malondialdehyde (MDA) and glutathione (GSH) contents were assayed. Liver histology was also examined. RESULTS: Totally 44 rats were involved in the result analysis. ①Level of serum cytokines: the levels of TNF α and TGF β in the SAM 100 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg groups were all lower than that in the model group (P < 0.05). Level of IL-10 was higher than that in the model group (P < 0.01). But there were no difference between the two groups. ②Live function: Activities of serum aminotransferase and aspartic acid transferase in the the SAM 100 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg groups were all lower than that in the model group (P < 0.01), but there was no difference between the two groups. ③Level of liver lipid peroxidation: The content of MDA of liver tissue in the SAM 100 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg groups was lower than that in the model group (P < 0.01). Storage of glutathin was higher markedly than that in the model group (P < 0.01). Level of SOD only had the trend of rising, without significant meaning. There was no distinct difference between the two SAM group. ④Changes of liver pathlogy improved obviously in the the SAM 100 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg groups as compared with the model group. CONCLUSION: No matter 100 mg/kg or 200 mg/kg SAM can prevent ethanol-induced liver injury in rats, which may be related with reducing liver lipid peroxidation, anti-inflammation and anti-hyperplasia.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?