Abstract:BACKGROUND:The assignment of a point-level geocode to subjects' residences is an important data assimilation component of many geographic public health studies. Often, these assignments are made by a method known as automated geocoding, which attempts to match each subject's address to an address-ranged street segment georeferenced within a streetline database and then interpolate the position of the address along that segment. Unfortunately, this process results in positional errors. Our study sought to model the probability distribution of positional errors associated with automated geocoding and E911 geocoding.RESULTS:Positional errors were determined for 1423 rural addresses in Carroll County, Iowa as the vector difference between each 100%-matched automated geocode and its true location as determined by orthophoto and parcel information. Errors were also determined for 1449 60%-matched geocodes and 2354 E911 geocodes. Huge (> 15 km) outliers occurred among the 60%-matched geocoding errors; outliers occurred for the other two types of geocoding errors also but were much smaller. E911 geocoding was more accurate (median error length = 44 m) than 100%-matched automated geocoding (median error length = 168 m). The empirical distributions of positional errors associated with 100%-matched automated geocoding and E911 geocoding exhibited a distinctive Greek-cross shape and had many other interesting features that were not capable of being fitted adequately by a single bivariate normal or t distribution. However, mixtures of t distributions with two or three components fit the errors very well.CONCLUSION:Mixtures of bivariate t distributions with few components appear to be flexible enough to fit many positional error datasets associated with geocoding, yet parsimonious enough to be feasible for nascent applications of measurement-error methodology to spatial epidemiology.

Categorical Mapping and Error Modeling Based on the Discriminant Space

A Conceptual Framework for Categorical Mapping and Error Modeling

Discriminant Models of Uncertainty in Nominal Fields

Discriminant Models for Uncertainty Characterization in Area Class Change Categorization

A Discriminant Space-Based Framework for Scalable Area-Class Mapping

Uncertainty characterization in spatial categorical information

Discriminant Models for Scaling Area-Class Maps

Misclassification Error Propagation in Land Cover Change Categorization.

Information-Theoretic Modeling of Categorical Spatiotemporal GIS Data

Positional Error Model of Line Segments with Modeling and Measuring Errors Using Brownian Bridge

Low Dimensional Representation of Space Structure and Clustering of Categorical Data

Modeling the Probability Distribution of Positional Errors Incurred by Residential Address Geocoding.

Parcel Area Processing Model Considering Scale Parameters

Spatial Correlation Between Categorical Maps

Subspace decompositions for association structure learning in multivariate categorical response regression

A Software Framework for Classification Models of Geographical Data

A hypothesis test for detecting spatial patterns in categorical areal data

Categorical Database Generalization

Spatial classification in the presence of measurement error

Topological Risk-Landscape in Metric-Free Categorical Database

Evaluating Representation and Scale Error in the Maximal Covering Location Problem Using GIS and Intelligent Areal Interpolation.