Abstract:Derivatives of differential equation solutions are commonly for parameter estimation, fitting neural differential equations, and as model diagnostics. However, with a litany of choices and a Cartesian product of potential methods, it can be difficult for practitioners to understand which method is likely to be the most effective on their particular application. In this manuscript we investigate the performance characteristics of Discrete Local Sensitivity Analysis implemented via Automatic Differentiation (DSAAD) against continuous adjoint sensitivity analysis. Non-stiff and stiff biological and pharmacometric models, including a PDE discretization, are used to quantify the performance of sensitivity analysis methods. Our benchmarks show that on small stiff and non-stiff systems of ODEs (approximately < 100 parameters+ODEs), forward-mode DSAAD is more efficient than both reverse-mode and continuous forward/adjoint sensitivity analysis. The scalability of continuous adjoint methods is shown to be more efficient than discrete adjoints and forward methods after crossing this size range. These comparative studies demonstrate a trade-off between memory usage and performance in the continuous adjoint methods that should be considered when choosing the technique, while numerically unstable backsolve techniques from the machine learning literature are demonstrated as unsuitable for most scientific models. The performance of adjoint methods is shown to be heavily tied to the reverse-mode AD method used for the vector-Jacobian product calculations, with tape-based AD methods shown to be 2 orders of magnitude slower on nonlinear partial differential equations than static AD techniques. In addition, these results demonstrate the out-of-the-box applicability of DSAAD to differential-algebraic equations, delay differential equations, and hybrid differential equation systems where the event timing and effects are dependent on model parameters, showcasing an ease of implementation advantage for DSAAD approaches. Together, these benchmarks provide a guide to help practitioners to quickly identify the best mixture of continuous sensitivities and automatic differentiation for their applications.

Study of the Automatic Differentiation Method for Calculating Sensitivities in the MDO of Flying Vehicles

The Application of Sensitivity Method in Vehicle Dynamics Analysis

Current Control for PMSM Based on Model Predictive Control with Automatic Differentiation

Application of Automatic Differentiation in Power System Trajectory Sensitivity Analysis

Dynamic Sensitivity Analysis of Complex Structure Based on FEM

A Novel Analytical Second‐order Sensitivity Calculation Approach Using the Finite Element Method for Chemical Engineering Problems

Assessment of Turbulence Adjoint Method in Sensitivity Calculation and Aerodynamic Design Optimization of Turbomachinery Cascades

Comparison of numerical differentiation based damping sensitivity method

A comparative study of design sensitivity analysis based on adjoint variable method for transient response of non-viscously damped systems

Analytical Sensitivity Computation Using Collocation Method with Non-Uniform Mesh Discretisation for Numerical Solutions of Optimal Control Problems

State-space based discretize-then-differentiate adjoint sensitivity method for transient responses of non-viscously damped systems

Statistical Evaluation of Performance Impact of Manufacturing Variability by an Adjoint Method

An Engineering-Effective Adaptive Model Algorithm Control (AMAC) and Simulation

Complexity Analysis for Hybrid Differentiation in Process System Optimization

A Comparison of Automatic Differentiation and Continuous Sensitivity Analysis for Derivatives of Differential Equation Solutions

Multidisciplinary Design Optimization(MDO) Methodology and Applications in Micro Air Vehicle Design

An Automatic Differentiation Based Interior-point Method for Optimal Power Flow

Sensitivity analysis of deployable flexible space structures with a large number of design parameters

A Computer-Aided Tolerance Specification Method Based on Multiple Attributes Decision-Making

Calculating sensitivity or gradient for geophysical inverse problems using automatic and implicit differentiation

Dynamic Response Optimization of Complex Multibody Systems in a Penalty Formulation Using Adjoint Sensitivity