Abstract:<p>Adjoint-based optimization methods are attractive for aerodynamic shape design primarily due to their computational costs being independent of the dimensionality of the input space and their ability to generate high-fidelity gradients that can then be used in a gradient-based optimizer. This makes them very well suited for high-fidelity simulation based aerodynamic shape optimization of highly parametrized geometries such as aircraft wings. However, the development of adjoint-based solvers involve careful mathematical treatment and their implementation require detailed software development. Furthermore, they can become prohibitively expensive when multiple optimization problems are being solved, each requiring multiple restarts to circumvent local optima. In this work, we propose a machine learning enabled, surrogate-based framework that replaces the expensive adjoint solver, without compromising on predicting predictive accuracy. Specifically, we first train a deep neural network (DNN) from training data generated from evaluating the high-fidelity simulation model on a model-agnostic design of experiments on the geometry shape parameters. The optimum shape may then be computed by using a gradient-based optimizer coupled with the trained DNN. Subsequently, we also perform a gradient-free Bayesian optimization, where the trained DNN is used as the prior mean. We observe that the latter framework (DNN-BO) improves upon the DNN-only based optimization strategy for the same computational cost. Overall, this framework predicts the true optimum with very high accuracy, while requiring far fewer high-fidelity function calls compared to the adjoint-based method. Furthermore, we show that multiple optimization problems can be solved with the same machine learning model with high accuracy, to amortize the offline costs associated with constructing our models. Our methodology finds applications in the early stages of aerospace design.</p>

Preliminary Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using Genetic Algorithm and Neural Network

Aerodynamic Optimization Design of Airfoil Configurations Based on Cascade Feedforward Neural Network

Multi-objective shape control of prestressed structures with genetic algorithms

Multiobjective Shape Optimization of A Hypersonic Lifting Body Using A Correlation-Based Transition Model

Particle Swarm Optimization of Aerodynamic Shapes with Nonuniform Shape Parameter–Based Radial Basis Function

Airfoil shape optimization using genetic algorithm coupled deep neural networks

Aerodynamic shape optimization using graph variational autoencoders and genetic algorithms

An Efficient Multiobjective Optimizer Based on Genetic Algorithm and Approximation Techniques for Electromagnetic Design

Aerodynamic Optimization Design of Wing Based on the Genetic Algorithm with Subsection Evolution

Simultaneous surrogate modeling and dimension reduction using unsupervised learning. Application to parametric wing shape optimization

Aerodynamic shape optimization using a novel optimizer based on machine learning techniques

An efficient optimization approach for designing machine learning models based on genetic algorithm

Multi-objective optimization of turbomachinery using improved NSGA-II and approximation model

Multi-objective Optimization of a Low Specific Speed Centrifugal Pump Using an Evolutionary Algorithm

An optimal design for subsonic wing planar shape and twisted angle by a modified genetic algorithm

A Hybrid Genetic Algorithm-Neural Network Strategy for Simulation Optimization.

Aerodynamic shape optimization based on Proper Orthogonal Decomposition reparameterization under small training sets

Enhanced data efficiency using deep neural networks and Gaussian processes for aerodynamic design optimization

Optimization based on adaptive hinging hyperplanes and genetic algorithm.

Hierarchical variable fidelity evolutionary optimization methods and their applications in aerodynamic shape design

Numerical two-dimensional optimization of a cylindrical fuselage for bioinspired unmanned aerial vehicle based on non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II