Verification of time-domain buffeting theory and analysis of influence factors for long-span cable-stayed bridges

Wanshui Han,Airong Chen,Xiaolun Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-131X.2006.06.012
2006-01-01
Abstract:In order to verify the current time-domain buffeting theory, not only the buffeting-induced structural displacements but also the buffeting-induced internal forces at the bottom of the towers were measured by means of dynamic strain gauges in a full model test of the Hangzhou Bay Bridge. A time-domain buffeting analysis considering pylon wind field was conducted to analyze the buffeting responses, the aerodynamic admittance function was set as 1 and Sears, respectively, and the equivalent wind spectrum method was used to calculate the buffeting loads while considering aerodynamic admittance function. A study on the spatial correlation of wind tunnel tests was carried out, and the influences of Sears admittance function and spatial correlation on the buffeting responses were investigated. The numerical results were compared with wind tunnel test results. The comparison shows that when the decay factor A is 12.9, wind tunnel test results fall between buffeting responses with aerodynamic admittance being set to 1 and Sears, the results calculated with Sears function being on the unsafe side. Spatial correlation greatly influences buffeting responses, the buffeting responses being reduced by about 13%-22% when the spatial correlation was changed from the one specified in 'Wind resistant design guideline for highway bridges' to the one measured in wind tunnel test. Verification of the Hangzhou Bay Bridge shows that the current time-domain buffeting theory cannot predict bridge buffeting-induced responses accurately, and there exists certain discrepency between the calculation and the tunnel test results.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?