Abstract:Although Dempster–Shafer (D–S) evidence theory and its reasoning mechanism can deal with imprecise and uncertain information by combining cumulative evidences for changing prior opinions of new evidences, there is a deficiency in applying classical D–S evidence theory combination rule when conflict evidence appear — conflict evidence causes counter-intuitive results. To address this issue, alternative combination rules have been proposed for resolving the appeared conflicts of evidence. An underlying assumption is that conflict evidences exist, which, however, is not always true. Moreover, it has been verified that conflict factors may not be accurate to characterize the degree of conflict. Instead, the Jousselme distance has been regarded as a quantification criterion for the degree of conflict because of its promising properties. To avoid the counter-intuitive results, multiple sources of evidence should be classified first. This paper proposes a novel algorithm to quantify the classification of multiple sources of evidence based on a core vector method, and the algorithm is further verified by two examples. This study also explores the relationship between complementary information and conflicting evidence and discusses the stochastic interpretation of basic probability assignment functions.

Analysis of Limit Performance of Combination Rules

New Method for Measuring the Degree of Conflict among General Basic Probability Assignments

A New Combination Rule Based on DSmT

New Rule of Evidence Combination Based on Improved Conflict Measure

Combination Rule Based on Proportional Redistribution of Generalized Conflict for Evidence Theory

Evaluations of Evidence Combination Rules in Terms of Statistical Sensitivity and Divergence

New Methods of Evidence Conflict Measurement Based on Conjunctive Combination Rule

A parallel approximate rule extracting algorithm based on the improved discernibility matrix

A Modified Evidence Combination Approach Based on Ambiguity Measure.

A novel combination rule for conflict management in data fusion

Combining Conflicting Evidence Using the DEMATEL Method

A New Method to Analyze Evidence Conflict

Research of Fusion Rules on Mass of Information

Combining Belief Functions Based on Three Mechanisms: Average, Multiplication and Intersection

Performance of fusion judgment on Dempster-Shafer rule

A Comparison of Evidence Fusion Rules for Situation Recognition in Sensor-Based Environments

An Efficient Combination Method of Conflict Evidences

Combination of non-distinct bodies of evidence based on commonality function

New Method to Combine Conflict Evidence Based on Pignistic Probability Distance

Quantification Classification Algorithm of Multiple Sources of Evidence

A new rule to combine dependent bodies of evidence