Comparison analysis in Multicast Authentication based on Batch Signature (MABS) in Network Security
Srikanth Bethu,K Kanthi Kumar,MD Asrar Ahmed,S.Soujanya
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1311.6001
2013-11-23
Abstract:Conventional block-based multicast authentication schemes overlook the heterogeneity of receivers by letting the sender choose the block size, divide a multicast stream into blocks, associate each block with a signature, and spread the effect of the signature across all the packets in the block through hash graphs or coding algorithms. The correlation among packets makes them vulnerable to packet loss, which is inherent in the Internet and wireless networks. Moreover, the lack of Denial of Service (DoS) resilience renders most of them vulnerable to packet injection in hostile environments. In this paper, we propose a novel multicast authentication protocol, namely MABS, including two schemes. The basic scheme (MABS-B) eliminates the correlation among packets and thus provides the perfect resilience to packet loss, and it is also efficient in terms of latency, computation, and communication overhead due to an efficient cryptographic primitive called batch signature, which supports the authentication of any number of packets <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://simultaneously.so" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> we discuss their comparisons and performance evaluation of Packet Loss, Comparisons over Lossy Channels, Comparisons of Signature Schemes, computationational overheads etc.
Cryptography and Security