Chemical Dynamics Simulations of Energy Transfer in Collisions of Protonated Peptide−Ions with a Perfluorinated Alkylthiol Self-Assembled Monolayer Surface
Li Yang,Oleg A. Mazyar,U. Lourderaj,Jiangping Wang,M. T. Rodgers,Emilio Martinez-Nunez,Srirangam V. Addepalli,William L. Hase
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jp712069b
2008-01-01
Abstract:Classical trajectory simulations are performed to study energy transfer in collisions of protonated diglycine, gly(2)-H+, and dialanine, ala(2)-H+, ions with a fluorinated octanethiol self-assembled monolayer (F-SAM) surface for collision energies E-i in the range of 5-70 eV and incident angles theta(i) of 0 and 45 degrees with respect to the surface normal. Both explicit-atom (EA) and united-atom (UA) models were used to represent the F-SAM surface. The simulations show the distribution of energy transfer to the peptide-ion's internal degrees of freedom, Delta E-im, to the surface, Delta E-surf, and in peptide-ion translation, Ef, are very similar for gly(2)-H+, and ala(2)-H+. The average percentage energy transferred to Delta E-surf and E-f increases and decreases, respectively, with an increase in E-i, while the average percentage energy transfer to Delta E-im is nearly independent of E-i. Changing theta(i) from 0 to 45 degrees decreases and increases the percentage of energy transfer to Delta E-surf and E-f, respectively, but has little change in the transfer to Delta E-im, Average percentage energy transfer to the surface is found to approximately depend on E-i according to exp(-b/E-i). Comparisons with previous simulations show that peptide-H+ collisions with the EA F-SAM model transfer approximately a factor of 2 more energy to Delta E-int than do collisions with the hydrogenated SAM, that is, H-SAM. Replacing the mass of the F atoms by that of a H atom in the simulations, without changing the potential, shows that the different Delta E-int energy transfer efficiencies for the F-SAM and H-SAM surfaces is a mass effect. The simulations for ala(2)-H+ colliding with the EA F-SAM surface give P(Delta E-int) distributions in good agreement with previous experiments and an average transfer to Delta E-int of 15% as compared with the experimental value of 21%. The UA F-SAM model gives energy transfer efficiencies in qualitative agreement with those of the EA model, but there are important quantitative differences.