Comparative performance of nematode resistant rootstock and non-resistant tomato cultivars on soil biota

Zhiping Cao,Guokang Chen,Yunfeng Chen,Hang Yang,LiFang Han,Richard W. Dawson
2005-01-01
Allelopathy Journal
Abstract:We compared the effects of two tomato cultivars - Maofen (Maofen-802) and resistant rootstock variety (Beaufort SIS-1, Lycopersicon lycopersicum x L. hirsutum) on soil biota population (fungi, protozoa, nematodes, mites) and microbial biomass carbon under severe infection of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita). The differences in soil biota composition were found between the two cultivars, when root-knot nematodes disease broke out in tomatoes near the harvest. The resistant rootstock promoted the soil microbial biomass and protozoa population, but decreased that of fungi (Trichoderma spp., Fusarium spp., Phytophthora spp., Pythium spp.) than Maofen cultivar. In resistant rootstock plot, both the root-knot nematode disease index and the density of Meloidogyne incognita juvenile were significantly lower than in Maofen plot during the late harvest period, but the density of free-living nematodes was much higher than in Maofen plot. Thus resistant rootstock increased population of beneficial nematode to suppress the pathogenic nematodes. Compared with Maofen, the resistant rootstock maintained the population of soil mites during the tomato growth and harvest period, contributing to a relative high biodiversity. Shannon-wiener's index of mites community were 1.63 in resistant rootstock plot and 0.83 in Maofen plot, while the Pielou's evenness index were 1.56 and 0.80, respectively.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?