Abstract:The design seismic base shear was obtained from the spectral elastic acceleration Sa divided by a system behavior factor R, accounting for ductility and overstrength. The behavior factor is currently taken as a constant for a given type of structures in various codes regardless of structural periods. In fact, the behavior factor is also a spectrum varying with the natural periods of structures. In order to understand the relationship between the spectral values and the corresponding characteristic periods in these two spectra, Sa and R, this article carries out an investigation into the characteristic periods of 370 seismic ground motions from 4 site types. It is found that the periods Tga at which the peak values appear in the Sa spectra are much less than the periods TgR at which the R spectra take a maximum value. Two characteristic periods are necessary to determine the seismic action if a more elaborate procedure is required in practice. Statistical study on these two periods is carried out for the 370 records, and results are presented. For site types A-D, the ratio of these two periods has a statistically averaged value of 5.5-6.7. The maximum input energy SEI, relative velocity Sv, power density PSD, and the Fourier amplitude FS spectra were constructed to determine their characteristic periods, respectively. These four spectra predict similar characteristic periods to TgR. TgR is very close to the characteristic period Tgd of the elastic displacement spectra. Analysis of SDOF systems under combined harmonic excitations shows that the Sa spectrum is more sensitive to high-frequency excitations, while the displacement spectrum is more sensitive to long period excitations. For the elastic-plastic Sa spectra, peak values tend to appear at shorter periods even the amplitudes of the longer periods are greater than that of the shorter period. This provides an explanation on different characteristic periods in the Sa and R spectra.

Uniform response spectrum characteristics of the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake ground motions

Bi-normalized Response Spectral Characteristics of the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake

Bi-normalized Response Spectra and Scalar Periods for Developing Uniform Seismic Design Spectra

Seismic Design Spectra Derived from Bi- Normalized Response Spectra

Site-dependent Bi-Normalized Earthquake Acceleration Response Spectra

Ground Motion Bi-Normalized Response Spectrum and Uniform Design Spectral Theory

Characteristics of Response Spectra for Long-Periods of Main-Shock Recordings of the Chi-Chi Earthquake

An investigation of characteristic periods of seismic ground motions

Normalized Inelastic Deformation Ratio Spectra

Bi-normalized combined response spectra of directivity effect ground motions in near-fault region

Consecutive Combined Response Spectrum

On standard response spectrum for nuclear power plant based on strong earthquake ground motions

Design spectra for nuclear power plant based on recent large earthquakes

Characteristics of Frequency Content of Near-Fault Ground Motions During the Chi-Chi Earthquake

Response Spectra for Nuclear Structures on Rock Sites Considering the Near-Fault Directivity Effect

Near-fault Ground Motion Bi-Normalized Pseudo-Velocity Spectra and Its Applications

Analytical model for response spectral ratio considering the effect of earthquake scenarios

Influence of Local Site Condition on Vertical-to-Horizontal Spectrum Ratio – Insight from Site Response Analysis

Normalized Elastic-plastic Displacement Spectra for Bi-directional Earthquake Excitations

Vertical-to-horizontal acceleration response spectrum ratio of near-fault ground motion

Divisional Optimized Aseismic Design Spectra for Nuclear Power Plant