Abstract:Nowadays in modern industries, the scale and complexity of process systems are increased continuously. These systems are subject to low productivity, system faults or even hazards because of various conditions such as mis-operation, equipment quality change, external disturbance, and control system failure. In these systems, many elements are interacted, so a local fault can be propagated and probably spread to a wide range. Thus it is of great importance to find the possible root causes and consequences according to the current symptom promptly. Compared with the classic fault detection for local systems, the fault detection for large-scale complex systems concerns more about the fault propagation in the overall systems. And this demand is much close to hazard analysis for the system risks, which is a kind of qualitative analysis in most cases prior to quantitative analysis. The signed directed graph (SDG) model is a kind of qualitative graphical models to describe the process variables and their cause-effect relations in continuous systems, denoting the process variables as nodes while causal relations as directed arcs. The signs of nodes and arc correspond to variable deviations and causal directions individually. The SDG obtained by flowsheets, empirical knowledge and mathematical models is an expression of deep knowledge. Based on the graph search, fault propagation paths can be obtained and thus certainly be helpful for the analysis of root causes and sequences (Yang & Xiao, 2005a). And with development of the computer-aided technology, graph theory has been implemented successfully by some graph editors, some of which, like Graphviz (2009), can transform text description into graphs easily. Hence the SDG technology can be easily combined with the other design, analysis and management tools. The SDG definition and its application in fault diagnosis were firstly presented by Iri et al. (1979). Ever since then, many scholars have contributed to this area, including modeling, inference, software development and applications. Many efforts have been particularly made to implement the methods and to overcome the disadvantages, such as spurious solutions. Here we recognize some representatives among them. Kramer & Palowitch (1987) 3

HAZOP and Fault Diagnosis Based on SDG for a Class of Continuous Reactions

Ontology-Based Fault Diagnosis for Chemical Process

Computational FLuid Dynamics, Artificial Neural Network and Genetic Algorithm As a Hybrid Method for the Design of Hydrogen Peroxide Separation Via Non-Dispersive Solvent Extraction

SDG-Based HAZOP and Fault Diagnosis Analysis to the Inversion of Synthetic Ammonia

Application of Neural Networks to Chemical Fault Diagnosis

Sdg-Based Hazop Analysis of Operating Mistakes for Pvc Process

Computer-aided Hazard and Operability Study Technique and Its Application Based on SDG

Chemical Process Fault Simulation Analyses Based on an Extended SDG

A Delaminating Modeling and Hierarchical Reasoning Method for SDG Based Fault Diagnosis

Research on Computer-aided HAZOP Technology

An integrative framework for SDG based fault diagnosis

Layered digraph model for HAZOP analysis of chemical processes

SDG Model-Based Analysis of Fault Propagation in Control Systems

Qualitative Fault Detection and Hazard Analysis Based on Signed Directed Graphs for Large-Scale Complex Systems

SDG-based Model Description and Fault Propagation Analysis in Control Systems

SDG (signed Directed Graph) Based Process Description and Fault Propagation Analysis for a Tailings Pumping Process

Design of the Intelligent Alarm System for Chemical Processes

A Signed Digraphs Based Method for Detecting Inherently Unsafe Factors of Chemical Process at Conceptual Design Stage

Research on the uncertainty problem of SDG fault diagnosis based on information flow

Building a Knowledge Base of a Fault Diagnostic System for Chemical Processes

The Integration of Hazop Expert System and Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams