Abstract:Introduction: To develop a valid and practical tool to measure the safety climate in China, and further raise awareness of it in Chinese industries, we developed the Chinese safety climate scale (including two subscales at the levels of organization and group separately) based on the work of Huang et al. in 2017. Methods: A descriptive survey with the convenience sampling method was conducted in Shanghai Disney Resort, China. A sample of 1,570 employees was involved in the final data analyses. The item response theory (IRT) analyses with graded response models were conducted using. Results: The unidimensionality and local independence assumption were held. The Cronbach's α of organization- and group- level safety climate subscale was 0.912 and 0.937, respectively. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed good model fit for a one-factor model of the organization-level safety climate subscale, χ2 (df = 20) = 129.158, p < 0.001, CFI = 0.994, TLI = 0.992, NFI = 0.993, IFI = 0.994, RMSEA = 0.059, 90% CI = (0.050, 0.069), and SRMR = 0.048. A one-factor model also fits well for the group-level safety climate subscale, χ2 (df = 44) = 219.727, p < 0.001, CFI = 0.996, TLI = 0.9925, NFI = 0.995, IFI = 0.996, RMSEA = 0.050, 90% CI = (0.044, 0.057), and SRMR = 0.046. Discrimination and difficulty parameters showed that all items effectively spanned the range of the latent trait and could successfully separate participants at different safety climate levels. Items in the organization-level and group-level Chinese safety climate subscales had significantly different discrimination parameters, fitted well with the models, and had a substantive relationship with the latent traits. Discussion: The Chinese safety climate scale was reliable and valid overall. They can facilitate the research and survey regarding the safety climate in China.

Control-Response Compatibility: Fuzzy Clustering Analysis and a Comparison among Populations of Different Regions

Comparative research on response stereotypes for daily operation tasks of Chinese and American engineering students.

Chinese Version of the Responses to Positive Affect Questionnaire: Testing the Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity in A College Student Sample

Multicultural and Colorblind, Investigating Intergroup Ideologies and Relevant Relations in Mainland China

The factor structure of Chinese personality terms.

Affective Reactions Differ Between Chinese and American Healthy Young Adults: a Cross-Cultural Study Using the International Affective Picture System

Measuring the Personality of Chinese: QZPS Versus NEO PI‐R

Differences between odd number and even number response formats: Evidence from mainland Chinese respondents

Stereotypes of Social Groups in Mainland China in Terms of Warmth and Competence: Evidence from a Large Undergraduate Sample

Consumer Susceptibility to Interpersonal Influence in Mainland China

The Application of Chinese Health Questionnaire for Mental Disorder Screening in Community Settings in Mainland China

Description of Personality Traits by Chinese Adjectives: A Trial on University Students

Research on Relationship Between Sex Sterotypes and Psychosocial Adjustment for Chinese Subjects

An Empirical Study on Different Tendencies toward Indulgence-Restraint Dimension from the Intercultural Perspective —In the Case of Guangdong Province

Cultural differences in responses to a likert scale

Responsiveness to Robots: Effects of Ingroup Orientation & Communication Style on Hri in China

Response Style Differences in Cross-National Research Dispositional and Situational Determinants

Response Style Differences in Cross-National Research

Rasch Analysis of CLVQOL Validity and Reliability in Urban Chinese Population

The development and validation of the Chinese safety climate scale using the item-response theory approach

Comparison for Cognitive Functions between Chinese Elderly and Americans