Phenotypic Plasticity of Mosla Chinensis and M-Scabra (labiatae) Response to Soil Water Status

BH Guan,Y Ge,J Chang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7016/bbas.200407.0229
2004-01-01
Abstract:The growth and architectural plasticity of Mosla chinensis Maxim. in response to soil water status were compared with the congeneric plant, Mosla scabra (Thunb.) C. Y. Wu et H. W. Li. Two-week-old seedlings were exposed to five levels of soil water for a 6-week period. The results indicated that: an individual’s total mass, root mass, apical height, basal diameter, accumulative branch length and branch fresh weight/dry weight ratio (FW(subscript B) /DW(subscript B)) of both species had high plasticity in response to soil water content (p<0.05), and the plasticity of these traits in M. scabra is mostly higher than in M. chinensis. The leaf mass ratio (LMR), specific leaf area (SLA), root mass ration (RMR), and root/shoot ratio (R/S) of both species had low plasticity. Furthermore, leaf mass, branch mass, branch mass ratio (BMR). and branch length ratio (BLR) had high plasticity (P<0.05) in M. chinensis but not in M. scabra (P>0.05) while branch number exhibited contrary trends. In response to soil water, M. scabra adjusted the traits of total mass and size, in terms of a bigger PI, more than M. chinensis while M. chinensis only adjusted partial branch and root traits, such as BMR, BLR, FW(subscript B)/DW(subscript B), RMR and R/S, more than M. scabra. The optimum water niches (OWN) of both M. chinensis and M. scabra are from 40% soil water holding capacity (WHC) to constant saturation, but M. chinensis is only found in relatively dry environments while M. scabra is distributed from dry to wet environments in the field, so the actual water niche (AWN) was separated from the OWN in M. chinensis, but not in M. scabra. Mosla chinensis grew slower and remained smaller than M. scabra and other neighbor species in the field, and it therefore had no competitive superiority in the community. Mosla scabra was very competitive because of its higher yield and taller growth.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?