Electrophysiological change of accessory nerve after brachial plexus injury and its effects on the function of trapezius

张高孟,王树峰,张丽银,陈正永,朱艺,顾玉东
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2004.11.062
2004-01-01
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Transferring accessory nerve to suprescapular nerve is regularly adopted to reconstruct shoulder abduction of the patients with brachial plexus lesion. But it is not clarified yet if the function of trapezius will be interfered with and when the newborn potentials of supraapinatus and infraapinatus appear after the transferring procedure.OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pre-end postoperative electrophysiological changes of the different sites of trapezius and its effect on the function of trapezius of the patients with brechial plexus injury whose accessory nerves were sectioned at the infraclavicular level and transferred to suprascapular nerves during operation.DESIGN: An auto-control retrospective study waa performed according to the diagnosis.SETTING and PARTICIPANTS: The experiment was carried out in the Department of Hand Surgery of Huashen Hospital, Ftidan University. During January, 1996 and February, 2000, the accessory nerves of patienta with brachial plexus injury were transferred to suprascapuler nerves, and 17 men end 3 women of these patients with full data, aged 11 to 46 years, with a mean age of 29 years old were selected aa the aubjects.METHODS: The accessory nerve of these 20 patients was sectioned at infraclavicular level and transferred to suprascapular nerve 3 to 6 months after injury. PHASIS was used for electrophysiological examination. The stimulating electrode was placed over the snrface of aternocleidomastoid muscle, and the record was made at the upper, middle end lower part of trapezius muscle and sternocleidomustoid muscle. The dynamic EMG end functional following-up were carried out at the supraspinatus and infraspinatus postoperatively.MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The testing of muscle strength before and after operation was performed, and the amplitude values of action potential of the upper, middle and lower part of trapezius muscle, and the abduction of affected extremity were measured.RESULTS: Sectioning and transferring of accessory nerve at infraclavicular level disturbed the function of the lower part of trapezius muscle obviously,while there was no significant effect on the upper and middle parts. The neural regeneration action potential of supraapinatus of 83.8% patients was detected 5-9 months after operation. All the patients in this group regained their function of shoulder abduction 2-3 years later.CONCLUSION: Sectioning accessory nerve at the infraclavicular level would interfere with the function of the lower part of trapezius muscle. If sternocleidomaatoid muscle possessea good function, the prorimal accessory nerve close to the branch innervating the sternocleidomastnid muscle can still be selected as a donor nerve in spite of the severe paralysis of trapezius muscle.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?