Relationship of the expressions of somatostatin receptor and binding characteristics of RC-160 in human salivary gland cancer cell lines MEC-1 Mc3 with prognostic rehabilitation

Yan Li,Jing Wang,JingLan Deng,Junzheng Wu,FuJun Li,Bin Liu

2004-01-01

Abstract:Background: The mechanism of the origination and development of human salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma remains unclear. Somatostatin receptor (SSTR) receives recognitions gradually. One of the hot spots in SSTR area is to study its biological characters and the distribution of its subtypes thoroughly. Objective: To discuss the expressions of 2 sub-types of SSTR, SSTR1 and SSTR2 in human salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC-1) and the high metastatic cell strain (Mc3) of human mucoepidermoid carcinoma and the differences of these two receptors in the binding with SSTR radioactive genin, 125I-RC-160, and the correlations with prognostic rehabilitation. Design: A non-random and non-control study was performed. Setting and Materials: Research was carried out in the Department of Oral Biology, and Department of Nuclear Medicine of Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University. Human salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma cells, MMEC-1, and, high metastatic cellular clone of human salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma cell strain, Mc3, established by Department of Oral Biology, Fourth Military Medical University were introduced. PRMI 1640 culture medium and trypsin were the products of Gibco. Oligonucleotide probe was prepared by Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. RC-160 was obtained from CyberSyn Corporation, Beijing. Methods: Cytometry and soft agar were employed in observing the biological characters of MEC-1 and Mc3 cell strain. The expressions of the two sub-types of MEC-1 and Mc3 cell strain, SSTR1 and SSTR2, were detected by hybridization in situ. The condition of the binding between MEC-1, Mc3 and 125I-RC-160 was analyzed by radioactive genin binding analysis. Main outcome measures: The biological characteristics of MEC-1 and Mc3 cell strains, the expressions of the two subtypes of MEC-1 and Mc3 cell strains, SSTR1 and SSTR2, and the binding condition between Mc3 cell and 125I-RC-160. Results: The growth of MEC-1 and Mc3 cells was stable and the speed of Mc3 growth was slightly faster than MEC-1 with high clone formation. The expressions of SSTR1 and SSTR2 were high in MEC-1, with expression rates of 82.6% and 81.7% respectively. There was no expression of these two sub-types in Mc3. The binding rates of MEC-1, Mc3 with 125I-RC-160 were (23.8 ± 9.4)% and (3.2 ± 2.3)% respectively (P < 0.01). Conclusion: MEC-1 has high expressions of SSTR1 and SSTR2 and higher binding rate with Rc-160 compared with Mc3 but lower malicious degree.