Effects of neurotrophic factor on cortical spinal tract regeneration after spinal cord injury in adult rats

鲁凯伍,陈哲宇,侯铁胜,金大地
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2004.14.063
2004-01-01
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor(GDNF) has been shown to protect spinal motoneurons, however, it is not clear whether GDNF can promote axonal regeneration after spinal cord injury(SCI) in adult rats.OBJECTIVE: To study the protective effect of GDNF on the regeneration of corticospinal tract in spinal cord injury adult rats.DESIGN: A randomized controlled study was conducted.SETTING and MATERIALS: The experiment was completed in the Laboratory of Neurobiology, Second Military Medical University. Sixty-four male Sprague-Dawley rats with body mass of 250-300 g were used in this study.INTERVENTIONS: The model of acute rats spinal cord compression injury was established according to the method of Nystrom. The compressive load is 50 g for 5 minutes, which caused severe thoracic SCI. 24 hours after injury,2 μg pCDNA3(4 μL) mixed with 6 μL DC-Chol(Control group, n = 32) or 2μg pEGFP-GDNF(4 μL) mixed with 6 μL DC-Chol(GDNF group, n = 32)were injected stereotactically into the injured spinal cord.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The presence of expression of GDNF mRNA and GDNF protein were observed using RT-PCR and fluorescence observation. Using the technique of HRP anterograde tracing and the immunohistochemical reactivity of NF and GFAP in the injured spinal cord, we observed the effect of in vivo GDNF gene transfer on corticospianl tract regeneration.RESULTS: RT-PCR confirmed the increased expression of GDNF mRNA in the injected areas at 7 days after injection. The expression of EGFP-GDNF was observed in the cells around the injection locus by fluorescence microscope at least 4 weeks after injection. Four weeks after GDNF gene transfer,there are more HRP labeling of corticospinal tract axons across the lesion in GDNF group compared with control group. In GDNF group, the maximum distance these labeled axons extended varied in different animals and ranged from 5 mm to about 9 nm from the lesion. The number of NF-positive axons in GDNF group(524. 33 ± 80. 55/low power field) was more than that in the control group(309. 84 ± 56. 65/low power field) ( P < 0. 01) . In GDNF group the number of labeling astrocytes( 186.68 + 16.25) was less than that in the controlgroup(239.78 + 21.44) ( P < 0. 01 ).CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that in vivo transfer of GDNF cDNA could promote axonal regeneration and facilitate the repair of the cytoskeleton in the injured neurons, suggesting that cationic liposome-mediated delivery of GDNF cDNA may be a practical gene transfer method for traumaric SCI treatment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?