Preliminary experimental study of in vivo endothelialization of viable homograft valve

刘建林,党晓敏,何西利
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-8259.2004.03.025
2004-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To determine an optimal method of in vivo endothelialization when homograft valve (HV) leaflets are treated with different methods. Methods: Twenty five fresh HV leaflets were divided into five groups randomly. The leaflets of Group I were fresh HV ones without any treatment; Group II were cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen for 1 month; Group III was treated by DOA; Group IV was treated by 25 g·L-1 glutaraldehyde; Group V was first treated by hypotonic/hypertonic, then with an enzyme-based solution. Each HV leaflet was trimmed to 2 mm one which was cultured with lymphocyte from the recipient. In order to compare the antigenicity of HV leaflets, 3H-TdR incorporation was observed after tissue-cell coculture and stimulous index (SI) was calculated. The HV leaflets of different groups were implanted into the sheep's femorofemoropopliteal for three months; then the following procedures were done. Immunohistochemistry of VIII factor correlative antigen was used to identify the cells property; observation of growth condition of EC and superficial morphosis of HV leaflets was made with scanning election microscope (SEM). Results: Multiple comparison showed that SI of Groups II, III, IV, and V differed significantly from Group I (P<0.05). Group I was highest, and SI of Groups III, IV, and V did not significantly differ (P>0.05), but Group III, IV, and V all had significant differences from GroupII (P< 0.05), Effect of reendothelialization of Group III and Group V was better. Conclusion: The antigenicity of HV treated with 10 g·L-1 DOA and hypotonic/hypertonic, and enzyme-based solution is lower and the receipient ECs are ready to cover the surface of them.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?