Low-dose Ultra-high-resolution Photon-Counting Detector CT for Visceral Artery CT Angiography: A Preliminary Study
Lingyun Wang,Yangfan Hu,Jingyu Zhong,Xing Yue,Zhihan Xu,Bei Ding,Jingshen Chu,Fuhua Yan,Weiwu Yao,Huan Zhang,Weiguo Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.06.044
2024-08-06
Abstract:Rationale and objectives: To validate the image quality of low-dose ultra-high-resolution (UHR) scanning mode of photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) for visceral artery computed tomography angiography (CTA). Material and methods: We prospectively enrolled 57 patients each in the full dose (FD) and low-dose (LD) protocols, respectively, to undergo abdominal CT scans using the UHR mode on a PCD-CT system (NAEOTOM Alpha), between April 2023 and September 2023. Both the FD data and LD data were then reconstructed into two series of images: (a) 0.2 mm slice thickness, reconstruction kernel Bv48, quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR) 4; (b)1 mm slice thickness, Bv40, QIR 3. The signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of seven arteries were objectively measured. The image noise, vessel sharpness, overall quality, and visibility of nine arteries were subjectively assessed by three radiologists. Results: The SNRs and CNRs of 0.2 mm reconstruction set was inferior to that of 1 mm reconstruction set (p < 0.001 for all the arteries and noise), however, the image quality of 0.2 mm reconstruction set was higher than that of 1 mm reconstruction set in qualitative evaluation especially for tiny arteries in Volume-rendered (VR) image (p < 0.001). The SNRs and CNRs were not significantly higher for FD group than LD group on the same slice thickness except for SNRs of common hepatic artery, splenic artery and bilateral renal arteries in 0.2 mm reconstruction set. In the comparison on image quality between normal weight and overweight patients within the same reconstruction set, the results showed that low-dose scan did not significantly impact the image quality in overweight patients. The ratings of visibility of nine visceral arteries were not significantly different among FD and LD at the same thickness reconstruction set except for superior mesenteric artery (p = 0.002 and 0.007 for 0.2 mm and 1 mm reconstruction set in axial image; p = 0.002 and 0.007 for 0.2 mm and 1 mm reconstruction set in coronal image, respectively) and left gastric artery (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001 for 0.2 mm and 1 mm reconstruction set in VR image, respectively). Conclusion: The low-dose UHR scanning mode of PCD-CT has proven to be adequate for the clinical evaluation of visceral arteries. Utilizing a reconstruction with a slice thickness of 0.2 mm could enhance arterial depiction, particularly for small vessels.