The Simulation of Shock/Boundary Interaction Flows with Several Temporal and Spatial Schemes

肖志祥,陈海昕,李凤蔚,符松
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2758.2004.06.027
2004-01-01
Xibei Gongye Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University
Abstract:This paper will compare the properties of convergence and efficiency of several known methods for simulating shock/boundary interacting flows. To obtain the accurate time marching from the nth level to the (n+1)th level, a fully implicit LU-SGS scheme with a Newton-like pseudo time sub-iteration (τTS) was applied to solving the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (N-S) equations. The results using both explicit four-step Runge-Kutta-τTS method and the original LU-SGS method were compared with those using LU-SGS-τTS algorithm. The convective terms of N-S equations were discretized with modified Jameson's central differencing, modified Van Leer and Roe schemes. Higher order accuracy for the upwind schemes was obtained with MUSCL interpolations. However, higher order schemes suffer from spurious non-monotonicity (wiggles or overshoot and undershoot). In order to overcome this, a smooth and continuously differential limiter was used. Three cases (NACA-0012 airfoil, RAE-2822 supercritical airfoil and ONERA-M6 wing) full of challenge for shock/boundary interaction of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional flows were computed using these methods. The numerical results using the temporal and spatial schemes were compared with the available experimental data. The results show that the second-order LU-SGS-τTS method does improve the properties of convergence and efficiency and the upwind schemes can accurately capture both the position of shock wave and the separation after the shock wave.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?