Synthesis, Characterization, and DNA‐Binding Properties of the Ruthenium(II) Complexes [ru(dipn)(dptp)](clo4)2 and [ru(dipn)(pat)](clo4)2 (dipn=n‐(3‐aminpropyl)propane‐1,3‐diamine; Dptp=2‐(5,6‐diphenyl‐1,2,4‐triazin‐3‐yl)‐1,10‐phenanthroline; Pat=9‐(1,10‐phenanthrolin‐2‐yl)acenaphtho[1,2‐e][1,2,4]triazine)

XL Hong,H Chao,LJ Lin,KC Zheng,H Li,XL Wang,FC Yun,LN Ji
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hlca.200490108
2004-01-01
Helvetica Chimica Acta
Abstract:Two novel tridentate ruthenium(II) complexes containing an asymmetric heteroaromatic and a polyamine ligand, [Ru(dipn)(dptp)](ClO4)(2) (1.2ClO(4)(-)) and [Ru(dipn)(pat)](ClO4)(2) (2.2 ClO4-) (dipn=N-(3-amino-propyl)propane-1,3-diamine; dptp=2-(5,6-diphenyl-1,2,4-triazin-3-yl)-1,10-phenanthroline: and pat=9-(1,10-phenanthrolin-2-yl)acenaphtho[1,2-e][1,2.4]triazine) were synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, ESI-MS, H-1-NMR. UV/VIS, and cyclic voltammetry. The DNA-binding behavior of both complexes was studied by absorption titration, thermal denaturation, and viscosity measurements. Results indicate that complex 2 binds to calf-thymus DNA in an intercalative mode but complex 1 binds to DNA in partial intercalation, and the DNA-binding affinity of complex 2 is much greater than that of complex 1. Theoretical studies for these complexes were also carried out with the density-functional-theory (DFT) method. The trend in the DNA-binding affinity and some electrochemical and spectral properties of the complexes can be further explained applying the DFT computational results.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?