Abstract:Abstract Background DNA microarrays are rapidly becoming a fundamental tool in discovery-based genomic and biomedical research. However, the reliability of the microarray results is being challenged due to the existence of different technologies and non-standard methods of data analysis and interpretation. In the absence of a "gold standard"/"reference method" for the gene expression measurements, studies evaluating and comparing the performance of various microarray platforms have often yielded subjective and conflicting conclusions. To address this issue we have conducted a large scale TaqMan ® Gene Expression Assay based real-time PCR experiment and used this data set as the reference to evaluate the performance of two representative commercial microarray platforms. Results In this study, we analyzed the gene expression profiles of three human tissues: brain, lung, liver and one universal human reference sample (UHR) using two representative commercial long-oligonucleotide microarray platforms: (1) Applied Biosystems Human Genome Survey Microarrays (based on single-color detection); (2) Agilent Whole Human Genome Oligo Microarrays (based on two-color detection). 1,375 genes represented by both microarray platforms and spanning a wide dynamic range in gene expression levels, were selected for TaqMan ® Gene Expression Assay based real-time PCR validation. For each platform, four technical replicates were performed on the same total RNA samples according to each manufacturer's standard protocols. For Agilent arrays, comparative hybridization was performed using incorporation of Cy5 for brain/lung/liver RNA and Cy3 for UHR RNA (common reference). Using the TaqMan ® Gene Expression Assay based real-time PCR data set as the reference set, the performance of the two microarray platforms was evaluated focusing on the following criteria: (1) Sensitivity and accuracy in detection of expression; (2) Fold change correlation with real-time PCR data in pair-wise tissues as well as in gene expression profiles determined across all tissues; (3) Sensitivity and accuracy in detection of differential expression. Conclusion Our study provides one of the largest "reference" data set of gene expression measurements using TaqMan ® Gene Expression Assay based real-time PCR technology. This data set allowed us to use an alternative gene expression technology to evaluate the performance of different microarray platforms. We conclude that microarrays are indeed invaluable discovery tools with acceptable reliability for genome-wide gene expression screening, though validation of putative changes in gene expression remains advisable. Our study also characterizes the limitations of microarrays; understanding these limitations will enable researchers to more effectively evaluate microarray results in a more cautious and appropriate manner.

[Validation of Cdna Microarray Technology].

Evaluation of cDNA microarray data by multiple clones mapping to the same transcript.

Selecting Reliable Mrna Expression Measurements Across Platforms Improves Downstream Analysis

Systematic Comparison of the Fidelity of Arna, Mrna and T-RNA on Gene Expression Profiling Using Cdna Microarray

A Comparison Study of Microarrays by Fluorescence Imaging and Surface Plasmon Resonance Imaging

Screening for Candidate Genes Related to Breast Cancer with Cdna Microarray Analysis

Large scale real-time PCR validation on gene expression measurements from two commercial long-oligonucleotide microarrays

Improvement in the Reproducibility and Accuracy of DNA Microarray Quantification by Optimizing Hybridization Conditions

Cross-platform comparison of SYBR ® Green real-time PCR with TaqMan PCR, microarrays and other gene expression measurement technologies evaluated in the MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) study

The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements

Evaluation of DNA Microarray Results with Quantitative Gene Expression Platforms

A study of inter-lab and inter-platform agreement of DNA microarray data

The Microarray Quality Control (Maqc) Project And Cross-Platform Analysis Of Microarray Data

Cross-platform comparability of microarray technology: Intra-platform consistency and appropriate data analysis procedures are essential

[Optimization of T7-based RNA Amplification System for Cdna Microarray].

Three Color Cdna Microarrays: Quantitative Assessment Through the Use of Fluorescein-Labeled Probes.

Improvement in the reproducibility and accuracy of DNA microarray quantification by optimizing hybridization conditions.

Reproducible and Reliable Microarray Results Through Quality Control: Good Laboratory Proficiency and Appropriate Data Analysis Practices Are Essential

Biostatistical Considerations of the Use of Genomic DNA Reference in Microarrays.

An Approach to Evaluate the Reliability of Hybridization-Based and Sequencing-Based Gene Expression Profiling Technologies

Assessment of Data Processing to Improve Reliability of Microarray Experiments Using Genomic DNA Reference.