Abstract:Type Ia supernovae play a key role in the evolution of galaxies by polluting the interstellar medium with a fraction of iron peak elements larger than that released in the core-collapse supernova events. Their light curve, moreover, is widely used in cosmological studies as it constitutes a reliable distance indicator on extragalactic scales. Among the mechanisms proposed to explain the Type Ia supernovae (SNe), the single- and double-degenerate channels are thought to be the dominant ones, which implies a different distribution of time delays between the progenitor formation and the explosion. In this paper, we aim to determine the dominant mechanism by comparing a compilation of Type Ia SN rates with those computed from various cosmic star-formation histories coupled with different delay-time distribution functions. We also evaluate the relative contributions of both channels. By using a least-squares fitting procedure, we modeled the observations of Type Ia SN rates assuming different combinations of three recent cosmic star-formation rates and seven delay-time distributions. The goodness of these fits are statistically quantified by the $ test. For two of the three cosmic star-formation rates, the single degenerate scenario provides the most accurate explanation for the observations, while a combination of 34 single-degenerate- and 66 double-degenerate delay-time distributions is more plausible for the remaining tested cosmic star-formation rates. Though dependent on the assumed cosmic star-formation rate, we find arguments in favor of the single-degenerate model. From the theoretic point of view, at least sim 34 of the Type Ia SN must have been produced through the single-degenerate channel to account for the observations. The wide, double-degenerate mechanism slightly under-predicts the observations at redshift $z 1$, unless the cosmic SFR flattens in that regime. On the contrary, although the purely close double-degenerate scenario can be ruled out, we cannot rule out a mixed scenario with single- and double-degenerate progenitors.

Bayesian Analysis Of Type Ia Supernova Data

Non-Gaussian likelihoods for Type Ia supernova cosmology: implications for dark energy and H0

Non-Gaussian Likelihoods for Type Ia Supernovae Cosmology: Implications for Dark Energy and $H_0$

Calibrating the effective magnitudes of type Ia supernovae with a model-independent method

Type Ia Supernovae As Speed Sensors at Intermediate Redshifts

Application of Type Ia Supernovae to Cosmology

A BayeSN Distance Ladder: $H_0$ from a consistent modelling of Type Ia supernovae from the optical to the near infrared

Bayesian Approach to the Best Estimate of the Hubble Constant

Reduced uncertainties up to 43\% on the Hubble constant and the matter density with the SNe Ia with a new statistical analysis

Union Through UNITY: Cosmology with 2,000 SNe Using a Unified Bayesian Framework

Supernova Magnitude Evolution and PAge Approximation

Revisiting progenitor-age dependence of type Ia supernova luminosity standardization process

Cosmic Type Ia supernova rate and constraints on supernova Ia progenitors

Cosmological Prediction of the CSST Ultra Deep Field Type Ia Supernova Photometric Survey

Cosmic Type Ia SN rate and constraints on SN Ia progenitors

Cosmology with Type II Supernovae

Faster Bayesian inference with neural network bundles and new results for models

Probing Systematic Bias in Low-Redshift Type Ia Supernova Measurements by Cross Analyzing Surface Brightness and Hubble Residuals

A possible resolution of tension between {\it Planck} and Type Ia supernova observations