Modification of Ruddick's Method for Case 2 Water Atmospheric Correction

Y Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.466158
2003-01-01
Abstract:Ruddick et al. Applied Optics, 39, 897-912 (2000), have extended the standard SeaWiFS atmospheric correction algorithm for use over turbid coastal and inland waters; however, their assumption of a spatially homogeneous constant ratio for the water-leaving reflectances normalized by the sun-sea atmospheric transmittance at 765 and 865 nm, under the simple b(b)/a model, can result in a significant inaccuracy for highly turbid water. Using the more accurate b(b)/(a+b(b)) model, which, more realistically, does not assume spatial homogeneity ratio, the calculated corresponding perturbation for this assumption is several times larger than what Ruddick et al. evaluated under b(b)/a model. Such perturbation-related error could exceed 10% in highly turbid water with R-(8) > 0.05. We suggest using the modified assumption,1/R-(8) = alpha(0)/R-(7)+(1-alpha(0))/f;instead of Ruddick's assumption, in SeaWiFS atmospheric correction algorithms for turbid waters. The Maclaurin seriers expansion of such modified assumption is expressed as,R-(8) = alpha(0)(-1) [R-(7)+ (alpha(0)-1) alpha(0)(-1)f(1)R((7))2+ (alpha(0)-1)(2)alpha(0)(-2)f(2) R-(7)3+.....]; -1<(alpha(0)-1) alpha(0)(-1)f(-1)R((7)) <1Calibration of alpha(0), an IOPs related regional parameters, is determined on an image-by-image basis from regressive empirical relationship of scatterplot of the-Rayleigh-corrected reflectances for these two bands. The calculated corresponding perturbation for Ruddick's second assumption is several times larger than what Ruddick et al. evaluated under simple b(b)/a model. Such perturbation-related error could reach 20% for the highly turbid water over the Pearl River estuary.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?