Comparing Random Testing with Partition Testing Without Test Cases Replacement

方木云,赵保华,屈玉贵

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13328/j.cnki.jos.2001.11.016

2001-01-01

Ruan Jian Xue Bao/Journal of Software

Abstract:Many researchers compare the fault-detecting ability of random testing and partition testing with test cases replacement. Great achievements are gained. Comparing random testing with partition testing without test cases replacement is not found in existing documents. However, in practice, especially at the early stage of testing and during module testing, test cases are not replaced. Therefore, it is necessary to compare random testing with partition testing under this case. It is done and four findings are proposed. One difference from the results done by Chen and Yu is that when the domain is divided into such subdomains with the same size, the same failures and the same test numbers, partition testing performed worst than random testing. How to form a subdomain with heavy failures by use of all kinds of information and then to give it a large number of tests is essential for partition testing.