Abstract:The purpose of this study is to investigate thermodynamic and kinetic properties on the hydrogen-atom-donating ability of 4-substituted Hantzsch ester radical cations (XRH•+), which are excellent NADH coenzyme models. Gibbs free energy changes and activation free energies of 17 XRH•+ releasing H• [denoted as ΔGHDo(XRH•+) and ΔGHD≠(XRH•+)] were calculated using density functional theory (DFT) and compared with that of Hantzsch ester (HEH2) and NADH. ΔGHDo(XRH•+) range from 19.35 to 31.25 kcal/mol, significantly lower than that of common antioxidants (such as ascorbic acid, BHT, the NADH coenzyme, and so forth). ΔGHD≠(XRH•+) range from 29.81 to 39.00 kcal/mol, indicating that XRH•+ spontaneously releasing H• are extremely slow unless catalysts or active intermediate radicals exist. According to the computed data, it can be inferred that the Gibbs free energies and activation free energies of the core 1,4-dihydropyridine radical cation structure (DPH•+) releasing H• [ΔGHDo(DPH•+) and ΔGHD≠(DPH•+)] should be 19–32 kcal/mol and 29–39 kcal/mol in acetonitrile, respectively. The correlations between the thermodynamic driving force [ΔGHDo(XRH•+)] and the activation free energy [ΔGHD≠(XRH•+)] are also explored. Gibbs free energy is the important and decisive parameter, and ΔGHD≠(XRH•+) increases in company with the increase of ΔGHDo(XRH•+), but no simple linear correlations are found. Even though all XRH•+ are judged as excellent antioxidants from the thermodynamic view, the computed data indicate that whether XRH•+ is an excellent antioxidant in reaction is decided by the R substituents in 4-position. XRH•+ with nonaromatic substituents tend to release R• instead of H• to quench radicals. XRH•+ with aromatic substituents tend to release H• and be used as antioxidants, but not all aromatic substituted Hantzsch esters are excellent antioxidants.This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

Is Homo Energy Level A Good Parameter To Characterize Antioxidant Activity

Why Static Molecular Parameters Cannot Characterize the Free Radical Scavenging Activity of Phenolic Antioxidants

Theoretical Elucidation on Activity Differences of Ten Flavonoid Antioxidants

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Study on the Antioxidant Activity of Carotenoids

Accurate Bond Dissociation Enthalpies of Popular Antioxidants Predicted by the ONIOM-G3B3 Method

AM1 Calculation of a Parameter Characterizing OH Bond Dissociation Energy

Theoretical Investigation on Free Radical Scavenging Activity of 6,7-Dihydroxyflavone

Theoretical Elucidation of Activity Differences of Five Phenolic Antioxidants.

Rate Constants for H-Atom Abstraction by HOO• from H-Donor Compounds of Antioxidant Relevance

Electron spin resonance estimation of hydroxyl radical scavenging capacity for lipophilic antioxidants.

Radical scavenging potential of phenolic compounds encountered in O. europaea products as indicated by calculation of bond dissociation enthalpy and ionization potential values.

Hydroxychalcones As Potent Antioxidants: Structure–activity Relationship Analysis and Mechanism Considerations

The Influence of the H5⋯O C4 Intramolecular Hydrogen-Bond (IHB) on the Antioxidative Activity of Flavonoid

Theoretical Elucidation of Structure-Activity Relationship of Flavonoid Antioxidants

Quantitative Estimation of the Hydrogen-Atom-Donating Ability of 4-Substituted Hantzsch Ester Radical Cations

Theoretical Elucidation of DPPH Radical-Scavenging Activity Difference of Antioxidant Xanthones

A New Method for Determining the Intrinsic Resistance Energy of H‐atom Transfer Reaction and Structure–activity Relationship of H‐donating Ability

Antioxidant Activity of Homalium Paniculiforum Stem

WITHDRAWN: is Antioxidant Activity of Flavonoids Mainly Through the Hydrogen-Atom Transfer Mechanism?

Quantitative Comparison of the Actual Antioxidant Activity of Vitamin C, Vitamin E, and NADH

Emulsifier-phenol Bioconjugates As Antioxidants. Molecular Descriptors Based on Density Functional Theory in Quantitative Structure–activity Relationships