Contrast Analysis of Flow-Discharge Measurement Methods in a Wide–Shallow River During Ice Periods
Jinzhi Lu,Xinlei Guo,Jiajia Pan,Hui Fu,Yihong Wu,Zeyu Mao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w14243996
IF: 3.53
2022-01-01
Water
Abstract:The discharge of natural rivers is one of the important hydrological factors that are considered when responding to ice-flood disasters during ice periods. Traditionally, holes need to be dug along the cross-section on the ice cover to gauge velocity distributions along the flow depth at each hole, and to calculate the cross-sectional flow discharge by integrating velocity profiles over the entire area. This method is time consuming, costly, and inefficient. The discharge measurement can be improved using the sectional flow-depth distribution and stream-tube methods. However, the selection of both the depth-averaged–velocity-estimation method and the typical survey-point position in the cross-section affects the estimation accuracy. This study first compared the estimation methods of the depth-averaged velocity, such as the one-, two-, three-, and six-point methods, and their estimation accuracy. Furthermore, the variations in relative-unit discharge distributions in common channels with cross-sectional topographies were analyzed, and the effects of the cross-section characteristic coefficient and typical survey-point position on the flow-discharge estimation accuracy were compared. The results show that the average errors of the depth-averaged velocity estimated by the one-point method at 0.5H, new three-point method, and six-point method were 1.96%, 1.22%, and 0.45%, respectively. The new three-point method is recommended if measurement workload and accuracy are key considerations. The cross-section characteristic coefficient is considered to be 0.5 and 0.25 for the natural river and artificial channel, respectively, and the maximum-flow-depth position in the mainstream area of the cross-section is selected as the typical survey-point position. Thus, the flow-discharge estimation accuracy can be improved. In conclusion, this study provides an improved stream-tube method for the measurement of flow discharge and velocity distribution in ice periods, which can be used as a reference during practical applications.