Abstract:Purpose: Monte Carlo methods based on the Boltzmann transport equation (BTE) have previously been used to model light transport in powdered-phosphor scintillator screens. Physically motivated guesses or, alternatively, the complexities of Mie theory have been used by some authors to provide the necessary inputs of transport parameters. The purpose of Part II of this work is to: (i) validate predictions of modulation transform function (MTF) using the BTE and calculated values of transport parameters, against experimental data published for two Gd2O2S:Tb screens; (ii) investigate the impact of size-distribution and emission spectrum on Mie predictions of transport parameters; (iii) suggest simpler and novel geometrical optics-based models for these parameters and compare to the predictions of Mie theory. A computer code package called phsphr is made available that allows the MTF predictions for the screens modeled to be reproduced and novel screens to be simulated. Methods: The transport parameters of interest are the scattering efficiency (Q sct), absorption efficiency (Q abs), and the scatter anisotropy (g). Calculations of these parameters are made using the analytic method of Mie theory, for spherical grains of radii 0.1-5.0 μm. The sensitivity of the transport parameters to emission wavelength is investigated using an emission spectrum representative of that of Gd2O2S:Tb. The impact of a grain-size distribution in the screen on the parameters is investigated using a Gaussian size-distribution (σ = 1%, 5%, or 10% of mean radius). Two simple and novel alternative models to Mie theory are suggested: a geometrical optics and diffraction model (GODM) and an extension of this (GODM+). Comparisons to measured MTF are made for two commercial screens: Lanex Fast Back and Lanex Fast Front (Eastman Kodak Company, Inc.). Results: The Mie theory predictions of transport parameters were shown to be highly sensitive to both grain size and emission wavelength. For a phosphor screen structure with a distribution in grain sizes and a spectrum of emission, only the average trend of Mie theory is likely to be important. This average behavior is well predicted by the more sophisticated of the geometrical optics models (GODM+) and in approximate agreement for the simplest (GODM). The root-mean-square differences obtained between predicted MTF and experimental measurements, using all three models (GODM, GODM+, Mie), were within 0.03 for both Lanex screens in all cases. This is excellent agreement in view of the uncertainties in screen composition and optical properties. Conclusions: If Mie theory is used for calculating transport parameters for light scattering and absorption in powdered-phosphor screens, care should be taken to average out the fine-structure in the parameter predictions. However, for visible emission wavelengths (λ < 1.0 μm) and grain radii (a > 0.5 μm), geometrical optics models for transport parameters are an alternative to Mie theory. These geometrical optics models are simpler and lead to no substantial loss in accuracy.

Mtf and Dqe Analysis of X-Ray Intensifying Screens

ANALYSIS OF IMAGE INFORMATION TRANSFER PROPERTIES OF X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREEN

Monte Carlo Simulation of Image Properties of an X-Ray Intensifying Screen

MONTE CARLO SIMULATION OFPOINT SPREAD FUNCTION OF INTENSIFYING SCREENS

A New Method Of Calculating The Diffraction Efficiency For Diffraction/Refraction Infrared Hybrid System

Experimental and theoretical assessment of the performance of Gd2O2S:Tb and La2O2S:Tb phosphors and Gd2O2S:Tb–La2O2S:Tb mixtures for X-ray imaging

Quantum Interrogation and the Safer X-ray

Quantitative modeling of perovskite-based direct X-ray flat panel detectors

Enhancing the Sensitivity and Spatial Imaging Resolution of a Hybrid X-Ray Imaging Screen via Energy Transfer at the ZnS (Ag) and a Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence Interface

Quantitative Dual-Energy X-ray Imaging Based on K-Edge Absorption Difference

Empirical and theoretical investigation of the noise performance of indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs) for diagnostic radiology

TADF-Based X-ray Screens with Simultaneously Efficient Singlet and Triplet Energy Transfer for High Spatial Imaging Resolution

Optical photon transport in powdered-phosphor scintillators. Part II. Calculation of single-scattering transport parameters

Preliminary Study Of Quantitative X-Ray Spectral Imaging With Spectral Deconvolution

Quantifying neutron scintillator screens with X-ray computed tomography

Performance assessment of CsI(Tl) screens on various substrates for X-ray imaging

The Low Light Level Image Intensifier's Application in X-Ray Imaging

Technical Note: Detective quantum efficiency simulation of a-Se imaging detectors using ARTEMIS

Can processed images be used to determine the modulation transfer function and detective quantum efficiency?

Research on Performance of Tb3+-Doped Silicate Luminescent Glass for High-Energy X-Ray Application

Research on the PSF of Scintillators Asγ/fluorescence Image Converters