Effective Viscosity of Unentangled Random Copolymer Films of Styrene and 4-Methoxystyrene with Different Copolymer Compositions
Jianquan Xu,Chao Lv,Binyang Du,Xinping Wang,Ophelia K. C. Tsui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.0c01394
IF: 5.5
2020-08-26
Macromolecules
Abstract:We show that the thickness, <i>h</i><sub>0</sub>, dependence of the effective viscosity, η<sub>eff</sub>(<i>h</i><sub>0</sub>), of unentangled random copolymer films of styrene (St) and 4-methoxystyrene (MeOS) supported by silica (SiO<i>x</i>) can be easily tuned by tuning the MeOS concentration, <i>X</i><sub>MeOS</sub>, in the copolymer. When <i>X</i><sub>MeOS</sub> is increased from 0% to 100%, η<sub>eff</sub>(<i>h</i><sub>0</sub>) changes steadily from suppressed to enhanced with decreasing film thickness. At <i>X</i><sub>MeOS</sub> = 10%, η<sub>eff</sub>(<i>h</i><sub>0</sub>) displays a nonmonotonic variation. Results obtained by fitting a three-layer model to the η<sub>eff</sub>(<i>h</i><sub>0</sub>) data show that η<sub>eff</sub>(<i>h</i><sub>0</sub>) of the <i>X</i><sub>MeOS</sub> = 0% film was dominated by the mobility-enhancing effect of the free surface, but as <i>X</i><sub>MeOS</sub> increases, the mobility-slowing effect of the substrate surface increases and dominates. The results also show that the propagation distance, <i>l</i><sub>t</sub>, of the substrate effect increases with increasing <i>X</i><sub>MeOS</sub> and is ∼2.6 to 6 times the radius of gyration of the polymer. We tentatively suggest the long propagation distances to be caused by the long-range van der Waals interactions. Analysis of the van der Waals interfacial potentials of the films supports this interpretation.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.macromol.0c01394?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.macromol.0c01394</a>.Details of estimation of the long-range van der Waals potential (<i>G</i>(<i>h</i><sub>0</sub>)) of the films; curves of film thickness, <i>h</i><sub>0</sub>, and ellipsometric angle delta, Δ, as a function of temperature, <i>T</i>, to determine the value of <i>T</i><sub>g</sub>; AFM height and phase images obtained before and after annealing at 130 °C; mean-square percentage difference, δ<sup>2</sup>, and η<sub>eff</sub> of the 3.2 nm PMeOS film (<i>M</i><sub>n</sub> = 16.0 kg/mol) as a function of Hamaker constant in the fit; water contact angle of our films as a function of <i>X</i><sub>MeOS</sub>; schematic of the layer model assumed in the calculation of <i>G</i>(<i>h</i><sub>0</sub>) ; fit values of the Hamaker constant, <i>A</i>, of the 3 nm P(St-<i>r</i>-MeOS) films; and estimates of the Hamaker constant, <i>A</i><sub>1</sub>, of our P(St-<i>r</i>-MeOS) polymers (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.macromol.0c01394/suppl_file/ma0c01394_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
polymer science