Calculation of temperature distribution of water-cooled microwave dipole applicator radiating in a biological medium

Wan Baikun,Zhang Lixin,Li Shiyin,L. Fengtong,Wang Wei
1997-01-01
Abstract:An insulated, water-cooled dipole radiating in a biological tissue was analyzed with a theoretical electro-magnetic model. The temperature distribution was calculated, taking into account the effect of the water flowing inside the applicator, and result compared with that of no-water- cooled radiating dipole. The numerical results calculated were conformed with those of equivalent muscle phantom experiment. It was shown that, the temperature distribution would be improved with the increase of therapy depth due to the effect of water-cooling. The water-cooling effect would make the maximum temperature point moving from close to the wall of the applicator (under condition of no water-cooling) to the deeper layer (over 6mm as shown in the text), and the radiating therapy depth extended to a depth 3~ 4mm deeper than that without water-cooling, thus the corresponding therapeutic volume being increased by 39% over that without water-cooled. If the heating program was applied according to following so-called two-step heating schedule: first small power heating without water-cooling, and then larger power heating with water-cooling, the total effective therapeutic volume would be increased by 1.24 times of that without water-cooling. | An insulated, water-cooled dipole radiating in a biological tissue was analyzed with a theoretical electro-magnetic model. The temperature distribution was calculated, taking into account the effect of the water flowing inside the applicator, and the result was compared with that of no-water-cooled radiating dipole. The numerical results calculated were conformed with those of equivalent muscle phantom experiment. It was shown that, the temperature distribution would be improved with the increase of therapy depth due to the effect of water-cooling. The water-cooling effect would make the maximum temperature point moving from close to the wall of the applicator (under condition of no water-cooling) to the deeper layer (over 6mm), and the radiating therapy depth extended to a depth 3-4mm deeper than that without water-cooling, thus the corresponding therapeutic volume being increased by 39% over that without water-cooling. If the heating program was applied according to the following so-called two-step heating schedule; first small power heating without water-cooling, and then larger power heating with water-cooling, the total effective therapeutic volume would be increased by 1.24 times of that without water-cooling.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?