Abstract:Crowdsourcing offers a new way for mobilizing the collective intelligence and efforts of a large group of people to tackle tasks which cannot be efficiently performed by machines (e.g., video transcription, monitoring road conditions at specific locations) (Doan, Ramakrishnan, and Halevy 2011). Many commercial crowdsourcing platforms are now available. Their business depends on providing satisfactory services to both the crowdsourcers (i.e. task requesters) and the workers involved. From the crowdsourcers' perspective, they expect to receive high quality results for their crowd sourcing tasks in a timely manner. From the workers' perspective, they want to earn as much as possible while committing limited productive effort.As the crowdsourcers are the main source of revenue for crowdsourcing platforms, their requirements tend to take precedence over those of the workers. Many commercial crowdsourcing platforms have implemented some variants of reputation-based mechanisms (Yu et al. 2013a) to gauge the workers' competence based on their past performance, and allow only those with good reputations to access tasks.While this simple reputation-based task delegation method is intuitive and has its own merits, a different, albeit related problem, has not received much attention. As crowd sourcing workers are human beings, they have limited availability and productive capacities to work on tasks delegated to them (Yu et al. 2012). Concentrating requests to workers with good reputations may result in details. In addition, as a small portion of reputable workers become overloaded with task requests while others remain relatively idle, attrition may occur in the worker population, thereby leaving the crowdsourcing platform with a shortage of workers.The potentially conflicting objectives between crowdsourcers and workers can be formalized under the congestion game framework (Monderer and Shapley 1996). In congestion games, the payoff for each player depends on the resources it selects and the number of other players selecting the same resources. For instance, the morning commute to work places by many people can be modeled as a congestion game. The time taken by a traveller on a given day depends on how many others are taking the same route as him.

What? How? Where? A survey of crowdsourcing

Task Assignment with Guaranteed Quality for Crowdsourcing Platforms.

Trust-Aware Sensing Quality Estimation for Team Crowdsourcing in Social IoT

General Framework, Opportunities and Challenges for Crowdsourcing Techniques: A Comprehensive Survey.

Crowdsourcing Database Systems: Overview and Challenges

Brief Survey of Crowdsourcing for Data Mining

Crowd-Answering System Via Microblogging

Evaluation on crowdsourcing research: Current status and future direction

Quality Control in Open-Ended Crowdsourcing: A Survey

Key Research Issues and Related Technologies in Crowdsourcing Data Collection

Crowdsourced Data Management: A Survey.

A technical survey on statistical modelling and design methods for crowdsourcing quality control

Brief survey of crowdsourcing for data mining.

Understanding Crowdsourcing Systems from a Multiagent Perspective and Approach.

Crowdsourcing: A Snapshot of Published Research

Research on Data Quality Control of Crowdsourcing Annotation: A Survey

Mining Reliable Information from Passively and Actively Crowdsourced Data

Infusing Human Factors Into Algorithmic Crowdsourcing

Crowdsourcing As a Future Collaborative Computing Paradigm

Selection of Crowd in Crowdsourcing for Smart Intelligent Applications: A Systematic Mapping Study.

Deep Learning for Mobile Crowdsourcing Techniques, Methods, and Challenges: A Survey